The tightrope
walk of diplomacy
By
Manohar Malgonkar
DIPLOMATIC slurs are never taken
lightly because of a conviction that they are never
unintended. As a rule, every slur is countered by what is
described as a measured response.
The classic case in point
is the strained relationship between India and the United
States of America during the presidentship of Richard
Nixon. Nixon had come to India a year or two before he
became President. He had paid what might be called a
courtesy call on our Prime Minister, Mrs Indira Gandhi,
who, for reasons best known to herself, or to her
advisors, had made him wait for a few minutes before
showing up.
So, when a few years
later, Mrs Gandhi went to Washington and called on
President Nixon, she, too was made to wait in a reception
room at the White House, for maybe, only a minute or two
longer than the time Nixon had spent waiting for Mrs
Gandhi in Delhi. And when, finally, Nixon did appear, he
chose to be standoffish, if not uncooperative.
Which may have been more
than what might be called a "measured
response", but then Richard Nixon was not
particularly known for his courtly manners.
But even for those
seasoned in diplomatic etiquette, a measured response is
not always possible. For instance when Adolph Hitler
became the dictator of Germany, he sent one of his
closest associates, Jaochim Von Ribbentrop as
Germanys ambassador to Britain. At the time of
presenting his credentials to the British King, George
VI, Ribbentrop quite shocked all those present, to say
nothing of the British public, by greeting the king with
the Nazi salute and a yell of Heil Hitler.
This sort of boorishness,
the British could not bring themselves to match. Either
that, or there just was no occasion for a suitably
measured insult, because the whole drift of
Britains diplomacy at the time was directed to the
single cause of preventing Hitler from invading Austria
and Poland and thus preventing war.
And it was in this
background that, in 1938, Ribbentrop was recalled to
Berlin to become Germanys foreign minister, and
Neville Chamberlain, Britains Prime Minister, gave
a lunch in his honour at No. 10 Downing Street. Winston
Churchill, who was also a guest, has described what
happened.
The head of Britains
Foreign Office, Sir Alexander Cadogan, was also at the
party. While they were at the table, a message was
delivered to Cadogan. After reading it, Cadogan had got
up to show the message to the Prime Minister and gone
back to his place. No one could have discerned from
"Cadogans demeanour that anything had
happened," Mr Churchill tells us.
Well, something had. That
message said that Germany had invaded Austria, and that
meant that Britain had no other option but to go war
against Germany.
The party went on, the
host and the head of his foreign office kept making light
conversation. The chief guest, for his part, must have
also known what the message said, but he too behaved as
though everything was normal and, if anything, prolonged
the duration of the lunch by "engaging the host and
hostess in voluble conversation."
Churchill gleefully
concludes his account of this luncheon with the following
comment: "This was the last time I saw Herr Von
Ribbentrop before he was hanged."
Which remark somehow
brings out the essence of civilised diplomacy:
appearances must be kept at all cost even as you
are entertaining a man whose death by hanging (as though
he were a felon in primitive times) gives you a feeling
of pleasure.
Needless to say it was not
always so. Diplomats in foreign countries were required
to play a double role: to maintain good relations with
the host country without compromising the interests and
dignity of their own country. Their greatest hazard was
the quite humiliating court protocol of absolute monarchs
who were quick to take umbrage at the slightest lapse in
the observation of protocol.
Indeed, in our own history
there is an example of how they dealt with the sort of
violations of court etiquette indulged in by Von
Ribbentrop at the Court of St James. When Aurangzeb
proclaimed himself as the Mughal Emperor, the Emperor of
Iran, Shah Abbas, sent an embassy to Delhi, headed by one
of his grandees, Budak Baig.
With Budak Baig, the
Emperor of Iran had sent rich presents: twentyseven fine
horses complete with rich horsecloths, 18 camels, seven
boxes of rose-water, and 20 of other perfumes which were
a speciality of Iran, four crates of embroidered silk and
as many as 12 carpets.
All very well, but did
Budak Baig know the precise way of salutation when he
would be presented to Aurangzeb?
Well, whether he did or
didnt, Aurangzeb was taking no chances. He sat on
the Peacock Throne as the Iranian ambassador was brought
into court. And when, in conformity with Iranian custom,
Budak Baig placed both hands against his chest and bowed
his head, four strong men who had been especially kept
ready to act in just such a contingency grabbed hold of
him and made him go through the motions of a proper
Mughal Kurnisat, the right hand touching the forehead and
the head bent below knee-level.
Aurangzeb who, of course,
had planned the whole thing, kept his head turned away
from the ambassador and pretended to carry on a
conversation with his son Muazzam. Some five years
latter, Aurangzeb sent a return ambassador to Iran. It
was headed by Tarbiyat Khan, a nobleman known for his
magnificent figure, scholarship, good manners but, above
all for his flowing beard of which he was immensely
proud.
This ambassador, too,
carried valuable gifts such as bolts of brocade,
elephants and most notably, a carved seal encrusted with
precious stones and a picture. After keeping it waiting
for several months, Shah Abbas ordered that it should be
presented at court on a certain day long after the hour
of sunset, so that the ceremony took place by the light
of candles and open-flamed torches held up by attendants.
The seal that Aurangzeb
sent said that Aurangzeb, the world conqueror had stamped
his authority on it as visibly as the sun and the moon
themselves. And the picture showed Aurangzeb, mounted on
a horse, receiving a sword from an angel. As these gifts
were proferred, Shah Abbas told Tarbiyat: "Will you
read out the words inscribed on the seal."
Tarbiyat, who must have
known the inscription by heart, made as if to read its
words, and as though to help him see it properly, one of
the torch-bearers brought its flame so close to his face
as to set his beard on fire.
After the consternation
had died down, the emperor taunted Tarbiyat. "Never
mind. We have barbers here who will trim your beard to
its proper size." Then he picked up the picture,
spat on it, and flung it away. "Rub your shoes on
that picture," he ordered his courtiers.
As a return gift, Shah
Abbas sent 49 horses to Aurangzeb with the message:
"Tell the world conqueror to attack Iran if he
dares. In case the lack of a cavalry is his excuse for
not attacking us, I am even sending him horses."
And when, after his
return, Tarbiyat reported these happenings to his master,
he was livid with rage. "Why did you not protest in
some manner? You stood and watched helplessly, surely you
had your dagger in your belt! You should have killed
yourself!"
As punishment, Tarbiyat
Khan was forbidden entry to the court. He did not long
survive his disgrace.
|