SPECIAL COVERAGE
CHANDIGARH

LUDHIANA

DELHI


THE TRIBUNE SPECIALS
50 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE

TERCENTENARY CELEBRATIONS


M A I N   N E W S

Punjab panel for 60 as retirement age
Also favours bonus for employees
Sarbjit Dhaliwal
Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, July 19
A high- level committee set up by the Punjab Government has recommended a slew of benefits for state employees just ahead of the elections. This includes an increase in the retirement age from 58 years to 60 years. It has also recommended that the demand to pay bonus to employees should be considered if financial resources allow it. There are about 2.5 lakh government employees besides 1.5 lakh employees of boards and corporations.

However, the committee, which was headed by, Mr B.R. Bajaj, Principal Secretary, Administrative Reforms, has opined that the demand of employees for promotional scale on completion of four, nine and 14 years of service should be referred to the next pay commission, which is expected to be set up soon.

However, the Chief Minister, Capt Amarinder Singh, has already made a commitment to the employees to give them this promotional scale at the earliest.

Other members of the committee were, Mr S.S. Rajput, Secretary, Personnel, Mr Megh Raj, Special Secretary, Finance, Mr S.C. Hata, Joint Secretary, Personnel, and Mr Nirmal Singh, Deputy Director, Information Technology. The committee, which has submitted it report to the State Government, has favoured the enhancing of medical allowance to Rs 300 per month from the existing Rs 250 per month. However, employees have been seeking Rs 500 as medical allowance per month.

Regarding the setting up of the pay commission, the committee has stated that the demand is under consideration of the department of personnel. Likewise, the change in the revised commutation formula for pension was also under the consideration of the Finance Department.

The committee had discussed the 29 demands of the employees in detail before making the recommendation. Regarding regularisation of service of daily wage, work-charged and ad hoc employees, the policy instructions in this connection were issued in 2001. However, many departments failed to implement those instructions within the prescribed period of six months. Under those policy instructions, the cases of eligible employees in the departments where instructions were not implemented, may be considered for regularisation by extending the time period.

However, the committee has not favoured the regularisation of services of such employees in future in view of the directions of the Supreme Court. The committee has said that in future employment should either be given on regular basis or on contract basis. There could be outsourcing of government job. But there would be no scope for employment on daily wage, work charged or ad hoc basis. The committee has recommended the restoration of rule 8(a) and (b) of revised pay rules.

The committee has accepted the demand to give money to employees for uniforms with the condition that they would wear the same. The demand to restore allowance of employees of Cooperation Department has been referred back to the Cooperation Department to decide the same at its own level. The committee has urged for making departmental service rule for those employed on contract basis. However, it has not recommended the abolition of contractual appointment system. In fact, it has stated that appointments made on contract basis are justified in some cases as these are made in public interest.

Regarding an increase in the Chandigarh Capital Allowance on the pattern of Delhi, the committee has stated that this issue should be referred to the next pay commission. The committee has rejected the demand for enhancing the 5 per cent pension after every six months of the employees, who retired on completing 33 years of service.

The committee has accepted the demand for giving no consideration to annual confidential reports in cases of assured career promotion schemes.

Regarding change in designation of clerks, the committee has stated that the issue should be referred to the next pay commission. It has also favoured the implementation of stenography norms and referred the demand for raising the type allowance of clerks to the next pay commission.

 

 



Back

 

HOME PAGE | Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Himachal Pradesh | Regional Briefs | Nation | Opinions |
| Business | Sports | World | Mailbag | Chandigarh | Ludhiana | Delhi |
| Calendar | Weather | Archive | Subscribe | Suggestion | E-mail |