E D I T O R I A L P A G E |
Sunday, January 31, 1999 |
|
weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
His plays created waves How the alleged fraud took place |
From
tandoor to court |
Awaiting Judgement NEW DELHI: With 43 of 100-odd prosecution witnesses having already been examined by Delhi's Additional Sessions Judge, Mr G.P Thareja, the trial of the three-and-a-half -year old sensational "tandoor" murder case is just half-way through. The case sprang from a love triangle with a happy beginning and tragic denouement. It all started with Naina Sahni and Matloob Karim, both class- mates and N.S.U.I leaders, falling in love. They could not marry, however, owing to stiff resistance from their parents. Later, Naina came in contact with Sushil Sharma, also a college mate and Delhi Youth Congress leader. Their acquaintance grew into a love affair and later culminated in marriage. Her murder on July 2, 1995, allegedly by her husband, who burnt her body in a tandoor at Bagia restaurant, a part of Ashoka Hotel Yatri Niwas run by him, shook the whole country and left the Capital benumbed. Out of the 43 witnesses examined until now, 26 have supported the prosecution theory that Naina was murdered by Sushil Sharma. Prominent among those who have corroborated the prosecution version are Matloob Karim, Mr K.K Tuli, General Manager of Hotel Yatri Niwas, Mr Philip, a singer in the restaurant, Mr V.N Sehgal, Director C.F.S.L (since retired), Mr D.K Rao, a senior IAS officer of the Gujarat cadre with whom Sharma stayed in Gujarat Bhavan after committing the crime and Dr Bharat Singh of the M.S Civil Hospital who had conducted the postmortem. The remaining 17 witnesses either turned hostile or were dropped on being "won over" by the defence. They include Mr Jagdish Taneja, who had supplied cassettes to the deceased on the day of occurrence, Mr Karam Singh, an employee of Sushil Sharma, Mr M.S William, an employee of Gujarat Bhavan, and Mr Sat Pal and Mr Parminder Singh, both taxi drivers who had allegedly helped Sushil Sharma to escape from Delhi after committing the crime. Mr K.K Sood, senior advocate appointed by the court to defend the accused, asserts that Sharma is innocent. He has been framed, he says. There are many loose ends in the prosecution theory. The prosecution has set up a mass of useless circumstances. A large number of witnesses have been given up. Only docile witnesses who were amenable, he says, to public influence for various reasons have corroborated the police theory. After completing the investigation in a record time of less than a month, the Delhi police had slapped a 19-page charge-sheet on Sushil Sharma on July 27,1995. Penned in Hindi, the charge-sheet alleges that the accused suspected his wife's fidelity. He thought that she was still maintaining her relationship with Matloob Karim. This suspicion led to a discord between them. More often than not, he used to bash her up. Another reason for the discord was that while Sushil wanted to keep his marriage with Naina a secret affair, Naina used to say that they should make it public. Sushil's immediate provocation to kill Naina on July 2, 1995, says the charge-sheet, was that when he reached his flat (No 8/2-A, D.I.Z. Area, Mandir Marg), he saw Naina consuming liquor and conversing with someone on the telephone. When he entered the house, she put down the receiver. Sushil suspected that she was talking to Matloob Karim and redialled the number. His suspicion was confirmed when Karim responded at the other end. Sushil was incensed and fired three shots from his licensed revolver. While one bullet pierced through Naina's head, the other hit her in the neck. The third bullet missed her and hit the airconditioner. Naina died on the spot. Later he bundled the body of Naina into his Maruti car and stuffed it in the oven of his restaurant. That night he stayed with his I.A.S friend, D.K Rao, at Gujarat Bhavan. The next day Sushil escaped to Jaipur. From there, he first went to Bombay and later Madras and obtained anticipatory bail. A police party led by the Additional Police Commissioner, Mr Maxwell Pereira, airdashed to Madras. Sushil then fled to Bangalore, where he surrendered on July 10. He was arrested and brought to Delhi. The police seized his revolver and blood-stained clothes and sent them to the Lodhi Road Forensic Laboratory. They also took blood sample of Naina's parents, Mr Harbhajan Singh and Mrs Jaswant Kaur, and sent them to Hyderabad for DNA test. The Forensic Laboratory report, reproduced in the charge-sheet, says: "Blood sample preserved by the doctor while conducting the postmortem and the blood stains on two leads recovered from the skull and neck of the body of deceased Naina are of "B" blood group." The DNA test report, also incorporated in the charge-sheet, says: "The tests prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the charred body is that of Naina Sahni who is the biological offspring of Mr Harbhajan Singh and Mrs Jaswant Kaur." The charge-sheet adds that the police had recovered a letter which Naina wrote to Sushil. The letter, inter alia, says: "I know you hate me and cannot adopt me. Do not waste your time. Take care of your life. Forgive me. Leave me to my fate. Do not suspect me. I know I do not deserve you. Do not say anything to my parents. They are innocent. Inflict any punishment on me you deem fit." Didn't Sushil Sharma take that too literally? The verdict of the court
is anxiously awaited, though going by the customarily
slow processes of law it is anybody's guess how long the
waiting period will be. |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | | Chandigarh | Business | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |