President Clinton on Kashmir
In his speech at the UN,
President Bill Clinton made a strong plea to combat
terrorism on an international plan to rid the world of
this curse, which was killing a large number of innocent
people. He mentioned Kashmir also. The statement was
intended to help Pakistan and embarrass India by hinting
at third party arbitration on Kashmir.
The question is: who is
guilty of indulging in terrorism in Kashmir, India or
Pakistan? Repeated demands have been made to declare
Pakistan a terrorist statenever India. Pakistan has
fought three wars ( 1947, 1965 and 1971) to grab Kashmir
and is now in the midst of the fourth Kashmir
warproxy war or guerrilla war. Since Pakistan
desires Kashmir at all costs, it is implied that the only
way to stop Pakistans terrorism is to put pressure
on India to present Kashmir to it on a platter. It has
already killed some 25,000 innocent citizens. Does
America want to reward terrorism or aggression?
They talk of 50-year-old
UN resolutions on Kashmir. Their first condition was that
Pakistan must vacate Kashmir not only the Indian part of
Kashmir but also the Pakistan-occupied territory of
Kashmir. Is Pakistan ready to comply with this condition?
During the past 50 years, the world situation has changed
past recognition and any old UN resolutions have become
dead as dodo.
Why should India part with
her Kashmir that has been an inalienable part of this
country for centuries? Kashmirs history is a part
of Indias history.
If Mr Clinton is sincere
about his desire to rid the world of international
terrorism, he should make his protege Pakistan to wind up
its bloody terrorism in Kashmir. India is taking only
defensive action.
Pakistan has absolutely no
claim on Kashmir. Its only argument that Kashmir has a
Muslim majority has no validity. Against 40 lakh Muslims
in Kashmir, India has over 12 crore Muslim
populationmore than Pakistan has. India has an
ageless reputation for tolerance and its Muslim
population is indistinguishable in citizens rights
and activities from others.
Pakistan once called its
aggression as a war to liberate Kashmir. Today it is a
Kashmir war sans Kashmiris. Their interest evaporated
only because a prolonged war was robbing them of peace
and their prosperity and income from tourist and other
sources. Today it is only an operation by Pakistan troops
(in mufti) and other foreign mercenaries, may be with a
few local hirelings.
P.D.SHASTRI
Chandigarh
* *
* *
Politicians
& their politics
This refers to Ms Tavleen
Singhs Politicians & their politics
(Sept 19). Politics is an art (knack) of gaining power
and retaining it to the befoolment and even bewilderment
of the others in the race. While our politicians have
perfected the art of dirty politics of power, they have
totally ignored the question of socio-economic growth.
Our political leaders in
the government sing songs of Indias achievements,
but in reality we have failed to evolve a system of
health and education for all. We love to discuss and
analyse the sex scandals involving the President of
America, but avoid the basic economic issues affecting
the everyday life of Indians.
We take pride in
constituting committees and commissions, which take years
to suggest only generalities for the
improvement of the countrys economy. Is it not a
cruel joke on the nation and its economy that our Prime
Ministers and Chief Ministers should sermonise on
reducing the financial unproductive burden on the
national exchequer but they themselves go on expanding
the already jumbo-sized ministries only to keep
themselves in power?
Our political and
bureaucratic leadership does not tire of exhorting the
youth to come forward and serve the nation with
determined sincerity, without ever realising that it is
these leaders who have themselves failed to formulate and
implement any long-term rational policy.
VED
GULIANI
Hisar
* *
* *
Religious
institutions
Apropos of the article
Issue before the SGPC by Mr S.S. Dhanoa (Sept
19), the learned author has enlightened the readers by
putting forth some well-researched facts and events to
clear the background of the issue. At the same time he
seems to have faltered, as any human could, in the
interpretation of two institutions.
Firstly, the Jathedar of a
Sikh Takht cannot be termed as merely a poojari or a
granthi, though in the real sense these two terms are
also not demeaning in anyway and would be held in high
reverence in any religion. Takht is a seat of
Miri and Piri, and the head of
such a seat is not only a granthi or
poojari but a temporal head too. That is why
the heads of Takhts are termed as Jathedars whereas the
head of a gurdwara is a Granthi or Head Granthi
Shri Harmandar Sahib has a Head Granthi and not a
Jathedar. The mode of eligibility QR for their
appointment is, however, still debatable.
Secondly, the president of
the SGPC cannot be called the Jathedar of the panth. He
heads only a parbandhak committee and is the
administrator of gurdwaras, and can best be called a head
sewadar. His interference in spiritual and temporal
affairs is not called for. However, like any other humble
Sikh, he has the right to his opinion and appeal.
BHAGWANT
SINGH
Mohali
* *
* *
Gambling
as a national curse
Gambling in any form is an
antisocial practice, may it be satta, animal races or
government-sponsored lotteries. All such activities are
rooted in avarice sans morality, and the poor are led to
believe that such decadent paths offer the only chance to
acquire huge amounts of money without hard labour.
However, the odds may be one to a million.
Gambling cannot be totally
eradicated from a society where the polity, the
bureaucracy and business houses are corrupt. But we can
individually decide to abstain from gambling, and also
educate our friends not to be mesmerised by such false
touch of golden rods.
B.
C. MAKHAIK
Shimla
* *
* *
Mustard
oil and butter
It is shocking to learn
that more and more cases with symptoms of dropsy are
pouring in because of the sale of adulterated mustard
oil. The Press deserves our thanks for educating the
public to stop the use of mustard oil and switch over to
desi ghee or butter till the situation becomes normal.
I want to bring to the
notice of the administration that shopkeepers have
started charging higher prices for milk products. To
quote a case, a famous brand of butter (100 gm) is being
sold by retailers at Rs 14 in Ludhiana whereas the
printed price is Rs 12 only. Let us admit that both ways
traders are benefited. After all, nature keeps the
balance for them. I am afraid if the soaring prices are
not checked in time, the people will suffer more than
they would have done because of dropsy. This is the
pitiable situation of the common man.
J.R.
SAGGAR
Ludhiana
* * * *
|