Humans as
guinea pigs?
By Ajay
Banerjee
Tribune News Service
CHANDIGARH / KASAULI, Nov
13 Are humans, especially the downtrodden
in a country where reports of sale of vital organs of the
body are common likely to be used as guinea pigs?
Is the country heading for a problem of sorts in the
production of certain vital vaccines used on a day-to-day
basis to immunise children against deadly diseases?
It sounds shocking, but in
the foreseeable future these may be the harsh realities
if the recommendations of the Union Environment Ministry
seeking a ban or a drastic reduction on animal testing
for vaccines and newer drugs are carried out in totality.
The usually passive
community of researchers in the country are reacting
sharply while pointing out the pitfalls of such a ban or
reduction in testing on animals. Permissions for projects
requiring testing on animals will have to be had from the
Environment Ministry. Researchers contacted by The
Tribune during the past two days opined: "Who is a
babu sitting in the Environment Ministry to decide on a
particular animal or on the number of animals needed for
a test.?" A multi-disciplinary ethical committee of
doctors could be the answer.
Apart from the long-term
ramifications on the probable misuse of poor human
beings, the proposed recommendations are going to effect
the production of vital serums used to cure deadly
diseases while quality control of several other vaccines
will suffer tremendously, say sources in the scientific
community.
The wheel has turned a
full circle since 1881 when the legendary Louis Paster, a
French scientist, invented the system of vaccination
through testing on animals.
A reduction in animal
testing and stricter controls will have a direct impact
on the production of vital vaccines and serums that are
produced in quantities of several million each at the
Central Research Institute (CRI), Kasauli. The CRI is the
only place in the country where vaccines for polio,
rabbies, tetanus and serums for the dangerous Japanese B.
Enciphalitis, snake bites etc are produced.
Each new lot of vaccines,
when it is produced, needs to be tested on animals. And
close to 50 per cent of the reliability in vaccines is
established through testing carried out on specifically
in-house bred animals like mice, rabbits, horses and
guinea pigs. Specific vaccines and serums are tested and
created through one of the species of animals. Some of
the serums like the anti-rabbies and the one for the
Japanese B. Enciphalitis cannot be produced without
animals at all.
The recommendations of the
Environment Ministry, which proposes stricter rules and
lesser use of animals, are still being debated among
scientific circles. On the other hand, the Indian Council
of Medical Research (ICMR), headed by Prof N.K. Ganguly,
convened a hurried meeting of researchers and suggested
modifications that do not curb the use of animals where
there is no other available alternative.
Though researchers at the
PGI admit that some bad research in which animals were
being misused was going on in the country and needs to be
stopped, a blanket ban would be detrimental for human
beings.
Sources in the CRI say
this may be a retrograde step. It may even act as a
foothold for the multi-national drug companies so that
they can import the vaccines, thus leading to an almost
10-fold hike in the costs of basic vaccines.
Dr S. Majumdar of the
Experimental Medicine Department, PGI, opines, "It
is possible that humans may be used as guinea pigs by
unscrupulous researchers to carry out risky experiments.
Imagine, if blood and organs can be sold or taken out
forcibly, then look at the probable risk of ignorant
human beings used as guinea pigs".
Professor Ganguly, in
Delhi, when contacted, said", If the modifications
suggested by the ICMR are carried out by the Environment
Ministry, then we should have no problem as far the new
rules are concerned." He, however, refused to
comment on the probable situation if the modifications
are not accepted in totality by the Environment Ministry.
The ICMR, among its list
of modifications, has suggested de--centralisation and
formation of ethical committees in each institute where
testing is carried out. It also wants proper housing for
animals and a stop on needless and repetitive testing,
Professor Ganguly observed.
He admitted that so far
international norms of animal testing were not being
carried out in India. The new rules would help prevent
the misuse of animals by the cosmetics industry. He hoped
that a new set rules with modifications suggested by the
ICMR would be through within the coming five to six
months.
|