Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Unconstitutional: Top court strikes down Khalsa varsity (repeal) Act

The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017 as being “unconstitutional”, saying the law singled out the Khalsa University amongst 16 private universities in Punjab. A Bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan said...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017 as being “unconstitutional”, saying the law singled out the Khalsa University amongst 16 private universities in Punjab.

A Bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan said no reasonable classification has been pointed out to discriminate the Khalsa University against the other private universities.

The apex court delivered its verdict on an appeal challenging the November 1, 2017 judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed a petition seeking quashing of the Act dated July 17, 2017.

Advertisement

The Bench noted the state of Punjab had framed the Punjab Private Universities Policy, 2010 and on November 7, 2016, the state Vidhan Sabha had passed the Khalsa University Act, 2016.

It further noted that on May 30, 2017, the state government had promulgated an ordinance repealing the 2016 Act. The Bench noted the 2017 Act received the Governor's assent in July 2017.

Advertisement

The Bench referred to the statement of objects and reasons of the 2017 Act which said, “The Khalsa University (Repeal) Ordinance, 2017 aims to repeal the Khalsa University Act, 2016 with a view to protect heritage character of Khalsa College, Amritsar.”

In its verdict, the Bench noted no material was placed on record as to what was the compelling and emergent situation so as to enact a law which could affect the Khalsa University. “No material is placed on record to show that there were any discussions prior to the impugned Act being passed or as to what material was placed and taken into consideration by the competent legislature,” the Bench said.

“We, therefore, find that the impugned Act singled out the Khalsa University amongst 16 private universities in the state and no reasonable classification has been pointed out to discriminate the Khalsa University against the other private universities. The impugned Act, therefore, would be discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution,” it said.

The apex court said the only reasoning given in the statement of objects and reasons of the 2017 Act is that the Khalsa College has, over a period of time, become a significant icon of Khalsa heritage and the university established in 2016 is likely to shadow and damage its character and pristine glory.

The Bench said it is to be noted that Khalsa College, which was established in 1892, is not a part of the Khalsa University. “It can thus be seen that the very foundation that Khalsa University would shadow and damage the character and pristine glory of Khalsa College which has, over a period of time, become a significant icon of Khalsa heritage is on a non-existent basis,” the Bench said. It noted the 2017 Act, which was enacted with a purpose which was non-existent, would fall under the ambit of “manifest arbitrariness” and would, therefore, be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

While allowing the appeal filed by Khalsa University and the Khalsa College Charitable Society, Amritsar, the Bench quashed the verdict delivered by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper