Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Trump must fulfil promises

With reference to ‘Loving to hate Modi & Trump too much’ (The Great Game); Trump has made a stunning comeback as the US President. American people want him to stop the prolonged war between Ukraine and Russia, restore peace in...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

With reference to ‘Loving to hate Modi & Trump too much’ (The Great Game); Trump has made a stunning comeback as the US President. American people want him to stop the prolonged war between Ukraine and Russia, restore peace in West Asia and spur the economic recovery of a battle-fatigued superpower. Business giant Elon Musk liberally supported Trump in his election campaign as most of the Americans were concerned about the economic slump and the rising cost of living. Though it is not fair to compare PM Modi with President-elect Trump, the former has an edge over the latter. Modi leads a disciplined life that has no room for any scam or controversy. In India, no Opposition leader, at present, seems to be his equal in mass appeal and stature. On the other hand, the scandal-tainted Trump’s vitriolic speeches have evoked fear and anxiety among migrants.

Raj Bahadur Yadav, Fatehabad

Duo’s polarising skills

Advertisement

Refer to ‘Loving to hate Modi & Trump too much’; both deftly capitalised on hate to achieve success. Their biggest asset is that they express their convictions loud and clear. Voters had a reason to believe what they said. The polarising skills of the two took the wind out of their adversaries’ sails. These leaders aptly convinced the voters that they had nothing to stand for except their disdain for those who could be responsible for their ouster from power. Unlike Rahul Gandhi, who has become complacent after the Congress’ performance in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Modi knows that only aggressive strategies win elections.

Lalit Bharadwaj, Panchkula

Advertisement

Factors leading to skewed sex ratio

Apropos of ‘Jolt to Haryana’; the significant drop in the number of girls compared to boys is a serious problem. Several factors contribute to this decline, such as traditional beliefs, safety concerns for girls, crimes against women, the dowry system and illegal practices like gender-based abortions. It is crucial to enact more stringent laws such as the Dowry Prohibition Act and the PCPNDT Act and enforce these strictly. Law enforcement agencies must also stop illegal activities that determine the sex of a baby before birth. The preference for sons and the general imbalance in favour of men are the main reasons for this social evil.

Gaurav Badhwar, Rohtak

Need to initiate reforms

Apropos of ‘Jolt to Haryana’; it is indeed a matter of great concern that in spite of being worshipped as a manifestation of goddesses, the girl child has to go through the turmoil of gender discrimination. To combat the menace of a skewed gender ratio, the government should enact stringent laws against the dowry system, which has undermined the pious matrimonial tradition. Amendments in the Constitution must also be made so that the girl child is regarded as an asset and not a liability.

Rupinder Kaur, Ambala Cantt

Community involvement required

With reference to ‘Jolt to Haryana’; the sex ratio in Haryana is declining due to cultural biases favouring the male child, sex-selective abortions and sex-determination practices. Despite the government’s initiatives like the ‘Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao’ campaign, progress on the ground remains slow. The imbalance leads to issues such as increased violence, human trafficking and difficulty in finding brides. Therefore, the path to improving the sex ratio in the state involves strong laws, consistent enforcement and a broader cultural shift. The state has made some progress, but sustained efforts and community involvement are needed to bring about long-term change.

Mananjot Singh, Rohtak

Embrace educational diversity

Refer to ‘SC’s divided verdict’; the decision on Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status is a landmark moment for minority rights in education. The majority’s view, emphasising AMU’s historical roots, affirms the importance of its founding purpose, while dissenting voices have argued for exclusive control. This debate underscores the complexity of balancing tradition with regulatory oversight. A decision affirming AMU’s minority status could strengthen its mission and set a critical precedent, shaping how India embraces educational diversity while upholding minority rights. Hopefully, it would lead to thoughtful reflection.

Amanjot Kaur, Mohali

Letters to the Editor, typed in double space, should not exceed the 200-word limit. These should be cogently written and can be sent by e-mail to: Letters@tribunemail.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper