Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

SC upholds Guj HC order quashing complaint against SRK in 2017 stampede case

New Delhi, September 26 The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the decision of the Gujarat High Court quashing a criminal case filed against superstar Shah Rukh Khan and others, who were booked for causing a stampede in 2017 at the...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, September 26

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the decision of the Gujarat High Court quashing a criminal case filed against superstar Shah Rukh Khan and others, who were booked for causing a stampede in 2017 at the Vadodara Railway station while promoting his film.

A bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and CT Ravikumar dismissed the appeal filed by an original complainant Jitendra Madhubhai Solanki alias Pappu, who had challenged the decision of the High Court dated April 27, 2022.

Advertisement

The bench said it is not inclined to interfere with the order of the high court.

Senior advocate Vijay Kumar, appearing for Solanki, said the high court had erred in its finding and quashed the case against the respondent (Shah Rukh Khan and others).

Advertisement

Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, who represented Khan along with advocate Ruby Singh Ahuja, and advocate Sandeep Kapur from law firm Karanjawala and company contended the high court had rightly quashed the case and passed a detailed verdict after dealing with all the aspects.

The high court had said in its order: “Insofar as offences under the Indian Penal Code are concerned,…the allegations made in the complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety, in the considered opinion of this Court do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against petitioner (Shah Rukh Khan)”.

It had said the act on part of the actor, during the promotion of his film ‘Raees’ could not be termed to be so grossly negligent or reckless, neither could an act on part of Khan be treated as the proximate and efficient cause of the unruly incidents at the railway station.

“Thus in the considered opinion of this Court , the allegations made in the complaint even if they are not controverted and furthermore, the evidence collected in support of the uncontroverted allegations do not disclose commission of an offence”, the high court had said in the order, adding the actor was promoting his film after obtaining permission from the authorities concerned.

It noted the alleged incidents happened as a result of culmination of many causes of which one may have been the act on part of the petitioner of having thrown ‘smiley balls’ and ‘T shirts’ into the crowd.

“…Out of thousands of persons present in the Railway Station on the date of the incident including police personnel and railway staff, none of the persons who might have been injured on account of the incident or even witnessed the incident had complained about the same,” the HC had said and quashed the complaint pending before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadodara.

Khan, the lead actor in the movie, had undertaken a train journey from Mumbai to New Delhi as part of its promotion.

It was alleged that a stampede-like situation arose when the train stopped at Vadodara Railway Station where some people received injuries and a few became unconscious.

Solanki, initially submitted a complaint at Railway Police Station, Sayajiganj, Vadodara inter alia praying for registration of an FIR against Khan.

Upon receiving no response from the police authorities, Solanki preferred a private complaint against Khan and others before the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadodara.

Solanki had alleged in the complaint that Khan was promoting his film during the journey by ‘August Kranti Rajdhani Express’ on January 23, 2017 without taking prior permission of the railway authorities. He had claimed Khan threw ‘smiley balls’ and ‘T-shirts’ into the crowd at Vadodara station triggering a scuffle and stampede.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper