Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

HC dismisses anticipatory bail plea in cheating case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised concerns over the growing number of cheating and criminal conspiracy cases in Punjab, driven by the high aspirations of its people to settle abroad. Dismissing an anticipatory bail plea filed by a...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Photo for representational purpose only. File photo
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised concerns over the growing number of cheating and criminal conspiracy cases in Punjab, driven by the high aspirations of its people to settle abroad.

Dismissing an anticipatory bail plea filed by a person accused of duping the complainant of Rs 9.1 lakh on the pretext of facilitating his brother’s travel to the United Kingdom, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the HC observed that such offences had become rampant in the state.

“In the state of Punjab, such offences are becoming rampant. Since the number of persons intending to go abroad is very large in the state, the incidence of cheating and criminal conspiracy of duping persons of their hard-earned money is becoming common,” Chief Justice Nagu asserted.

Advertisement

The matter was placed before Chief Justice Nagu’s Bench after the accused filed an anticipatory bail plea apprehending his arrest in a case of cheating and criminal conspiracy registered at the Model Town police station in Ludhiana district under Sections 420 and 120-B of the IPC on September 6.

After going through the documents and hearing rival contentions, Chief Justice Nagu observed three cheques were issued to the complainant after the promised arrangement did not materialise, but were dishonoured.

Advertisement

“Considering the amount of money involved and the antecedents of the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail. The petitioner should join the investigation where his custodial interrogation appears to be necessary,” the Chief Justice asserted. The state was represented by Additional Advocate-General Gagneshwar Singh Walia.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper