DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Can’t reopen selection process after revised PSTET result, High Court dismisses 93 pleas

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that candidates cannot seek reconsideration for selection based on a revised Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test (PSTET) result once the process has concluded. Holding that the eligibility of candidates was to be...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that candidates cannot seek reconsideration for selection based on a revised Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test (PSTET) result once the process has concluded.

Holding that the eligibility of candidates was to be assessed up to the last date of submission of the application forms, the court also dismissed 93 petitions challenging the finalised selection process for the posts of Master/Mistress in Punjab.

The question for adjudication before the Bench was whether the PSTET result revised in 2017 could be brought into operation to recalculate the candidates’ merit in the selection process that stood concluded. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi observed a candidate’s eligibility was to be seen up to the last date of submission of the application form.

Advertisement

The court observed the petitioner-candidates had either not passed the PSTET or had secured particular marks on the relevant date, which were duly considered by the selection committee during the recruitment process.

“Once, the petitioners have been evaluated keeping in view their result of Punjab State Teacher Eligibility Test as on the last date of submission of the application form, they cannot claim the revision of the result on subsequent revision of their marks which only came into existence after the completion of the selection process,” Justice Sethi asserted

Advertisement

The case revolved around petitioners seeking a recalculation of their merit, based on a revised PSTET result, which came into existence after the conclusion of the selection process. The court noted that granting such a claim would disrupt the selection and appointment of candidates already finalised and working for over a decade.

Justice Sethi asserted: “The candidates, who have already been selected keeping in view their eligibility on the last date of submission of application form, cannot be made to suffer merely because the PSTET result of the petitioners have been revised after the completion of the selection.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper