Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Anticipatory bail maintainable in rape cases of minors: HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that anticipatory bail is maintainable and can be granted to an accused in cases alleging rape or gang rape of women under 16 and 12 years of age. However, the...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that anticipatory bail is maintainable and can be granted to an accused in cases alleging rape or gang rape of women under 16 and 12 years of age. However, the ruling by Justice Sumeet Goel comes with a rider – the applicant is required to show that the case, as alleged, is not prima facie made out against him, or where the complainant/ prosecution’s case is prima facie false, motivated or mala fide.

Justice Goel also made it clear that relief can be given in a situation where non-granting of anticipatory bail would amount to miscarriage of justice or abuse of the process of law. “There is no gainsaying that no exhaustive guidelines can possibly be laid down to govern such judicial discretion as every case, especially a criminal case, has its own factual conspectus,” the Bench ruled.

Justice Goel, at the same time, sounded a word of caution. The court was required to accord cogent reasons in case it deemed it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail, showing due and manifest application of judicial mind to the facts of the matter.

Advertisement

For reaching the conclusion, Justice Goel referred to matters where the statute barred anticipatory bail. The Bench observed the Supreme Court, dealing with the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, held anticipatory bail to be maintainable where the applicant was able to show prima facie that case under the Act was not made out or where non-granting of relief would result in miscarriage of justice or abuse of process of law.

The Supreme Court noted a competent court could consider granting bail in matters under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, even if the statute barred the same, if prima facie case was not made out.

Advertisement

Justice Goel asserted: “In our culture where a girl child is held in reverence, merely looking at her with prurient curiosity is an act of grave moral turpitude. Whereas sexual violation is the most degenerate, deviant and repugnant act & it must be condemned and punished accordingly. Where a young girl child is subjected to physical violation; she is actually a mere innocent child, who probably does not even fully understand what she has been subjected to”.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
'
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper