Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

SC upholds validity of National Green Tribunal

New Delhi, May 18 The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the validity of Section 3 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 that empowers the Central Government to establish the NGT. A Bench led by Justice KM Joseph said...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, May 18

The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the validity of Section 3 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 that empowers the Central Government to establish the NGT.

A Bench led by Justice KM Joseph said it was not a case of excessive delegation of power to the Central Government. “The National Green Tribunal under Section 14 & 22 of the NGT Act does not oust the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 & 227 as the same is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution,” said the Bench which also included Justice Hrishikesh Roy.

Advertisement

It rejected the plea to transfer the seat of the NGT’s Madhya Pradesh Bench from Bhopal to Jabalpur, saying benches were created as per exigencies.

The remedy of direct appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 22 of the NGT Act is intra vires the Constitution of India.

Advertisement

The verdict came on a petition filed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association challenging Section 3 of the NGT Act regarding establishment of the tribunal.

The petitioner had contended that the provision gave the Centre excessive, unchecked powers to notify NGT seats/benches without sufficient consultations with Chief Justices of High Courts, the Union Cabinet or the President, as is the constitutional norm for other such decisions related to the judiciary.

Attorney General KK Venugopal had submitted that the NGT was created on the recommendations of the 186th Law Commission Report, which mentioned the aspect about direct appeals to the top court. The remedy to High Courts remained available and the Sections in this regard were thus not in violation of the basic structure of the Constitution.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper