Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Bombay High Court rejects actor Gehana Vasisht’s pre-arrest bail plea in porn films case

Mumbai, September 7 The Bombay High Court on Tuesday rejected the pre-arrest bail plea filed by actor Gehana Vasisht accused in a case related to pornographic films. Vasisht is accused of threatening, coercing and luring women with money to act...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Mumbai, September 7

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday rejected the pre-arrest bail plea filed by actor Gehana Vasisht accused in a case related to pornographic films.

Vasisht is accused of threatening, coercing and luring women with money to act in pornographic films.

Advertisement

Justice SK Shinde refused to grant anticipatory bail to the actor on Tuesday.

Vasisht filed the plea last month, apprehending arrest in the case.

Advertisement

She has been booked under Sections 354-C (outraging modesty of woman), 292 and 293 (sale of obscene material) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 66 E, 67, 67 A (transmission of sexually explicit material) of the Information Technology Act, and provisions of the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.

The city police had registered three FIRs in the porn films racket case against several persons.

Businessman Raj Kundra, the husband of actor Shilpa Shetty, is an accused in one of the FIRs. He was arrested on July 19 and is currently in judicial custody.

The police’s case against Vasisht is that she had lured women with the promise of small acting jobs and forced them to act in obscene movies. These movies were then uploaded on the mobile app Hotshots, allegedly owned by Kundra.

The police subsequently also filed an application before a lower court to add another charge against Vasisht under Section 370 (detaining a person against their will) of the IPC.

Vasisht’s advocate Abhishek Yende had earlier argued that the actor’s arrest was not required as the police had already recovered evidence from her. PTI

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper