Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Plea in SC seeks restoration of J&K statehood in two months

Likely to be listed for hearing after Dasehra break
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Supreme Court has dismissed petitions seeking a review of its July 25 verdict that ruled royalty payable on minerals was not a tax and states had the legislative competence to impose taxes on mineral rights and mineral-bearing land. - File photo
Advertisement

Contending that J&K Assembly election results would be meaningless without the restoration of statehood, a plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking restoration of its statehood in two months.

Referring to the Assembly polls in Jammu and Kashmir, applicants Zahoor Ahmed Bhat and activist Khurshaid Ahmad Malik said the formation of the Legislative Assembly before the restoration of statehood would violate the idea of federalism - a part of basic structure of the Constitution.

Since the Assembly elections were conducted peacefully, there would be no security concerns in case the top court passed a direction to restore statehood to the Union Territory within a time-bound period, it submitted.

Advertisement

“The delay in restoration of statehood will cause serious reduction of democratically elected government in J&K causing grave violation of the idea of federalism, which forms part of the basic structure of the Constitution of India,” they contended.

The application was likely to be listed for hearing after the Dasehra break.

Advertisement

In a historic verdict, the Supreme Court on December 11, 2023 upheld the Centre’s decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution that gave special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir and said “restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest”.

A five-judge Constitution Bench, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, had unanimously directed the Election Commission to hold elections in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir by September 30, 2024 without waiting for restoration of statehood.

While upholding creation of Ladakh as a separate union territory in view of the security reasons, the top court had left open the legal question as to whether Parliament can completely convert a state into a union territory as opposed to carving out a UT from a state in view of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s statement that the Centre would restore statehood to Jammu and Kashmir.

The BJP-led Government at the Centre has already said it would restore statehood to Jammu and Kashmir.

Now, Bhat — a college teacher — and activist Malik have contended in an application filed in the top court that despite the assurance given by the Solicitor General that J&K’s statehood will be restored, the Union has not taken any step in that regard in the past 10 months since the Constitution Bench verdict.

If directions to restore the status of the statehood of J&K are not passed at the earliest by this court, it would lead to grave harm being caused to the federal structure of the country, the applicants submitted.

SC upheld Centre’s decision last year

In a historic verdict, the Supreme Court on December 11, 2023 had upheld the Centre’s decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution that gave special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir and said “restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest”.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
'
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper