DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

SC to examine if POSH Act should apply to political parties

The Supreme Court on Monday will examine whether the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, (POSH Act), should apply to political parties too. A Supreme Court Bench, led by Justice Surya Kant, will take...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement
The Supreme Court on Monday will examine whether the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, (POSH Act), should apply to political parties too.

A Supreme Court Bench, led by Justice Surya Kant, will take up a PIL filed by a lawyer, demanding application of POSH Act to political parties across India.

Filed by advocate Yogamaya MG, the PIL highlighted non-compliance with the POSH Act by political parties, many of which have not constituted Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to deal with sexual harassment complaints. It demanded that the definitions of ‘workplace’ and ‘employer’ under the POSH Act be harmoniously interpreted to make the law applicable to political parties.

Advertisement

“The current exclusion of political parties from the POSH Act’s scope is a significant concern, as it leaves women in politics vulnerable to harassment and abuse. To effectively address this issue, inclusion of political parties under the Act is crucial. This would provide women politicians with a safer and more supportive environment, enabling them to participate fully in the political process”, the PIL submitted.

The PIL urged the top court to hold political parties accountable for preventing and addressing sexual harassment and ensure a safe and inclusive work environment for women in political parties.

Advertisement

“Failure to mandate the compliance of POSH Act for political parties will dissuade able female politicians from entering politics, ultimately compromising their right to equal representation and an unbiased and holistic governance of the country,” the PIL contended.

"The lack of transparency, inadequate structures, and inconsistent implementation of ICCs perpetuate a culture that fails to prioritise women's safety and empowerment," the plea submitted.

The PIL questioned the 2022 Kerala High Court verdict, which ruled that since there existed no employer-employee relationship between members of political parties, they were not required to have an ICC under the POSH Act.

Making the Centre, BJP, Congress, AAP, TMC, NCP, NPP, BSP, CPI(M) and CPI parties to the PIL, the petitioner sought a grievance redressal mechanism for enforcement of the Act.

Making the POSH Act applicable to political parties would create varied levels of protection and support for victims of sexual harassment, the PIL contended.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper