Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Mere breakup can’t result in criminal cases, says SC

Holding that a mere breakup of a relationship between a consenting couple cannot result in lodging of criminal cases, the Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed a rape case filed against a Delhi man, who refused to marry a woman he...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Holding that a mere breakup of a relationship between a consenting couple cannot result in lodging of criminal cases, the Supreme Court on Wednesday quashed a rape case filed against a Delhi man, who refused to marry a woman he used to date.

“The relationship between the parties was cordial and also consensual in nature. A mere breakup of a relationship between a consenting couple cannot result in initiation of criminal proceedings. What was a consensual relationship between the parties at the initial stages cannot be given a colour of criminality when the said relationship does not fructify into a marital relationship,” a Bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice N Kotiswar Singh said.

Noting that both parties were now married to someone else and had moved on in their respective lives, the Bench said, “Thus, in our view, the continuation of the prosecution in the present case would amount to a gross abuse of the process of law. Therefore, no purpose would be served by continuing the prosecution.”

Advertisement

The woman had filed an FIR in September 2019 against the man, accusing him of sexually exploiting her under the false promise of marriage, forcibly engaging in sex and threatening her to keep engaging in physical relations, else he would harm her family.

“It is inconceivable that the complainant would continue to meet the appellant or maintain a prolonged association or physical relationship with him in the absence of voluntary consent on her part. Moreover, it would have been improbable for the appellant to ascertain the complainant’s residential address, as mentioned in the FIR unless such information had been voluntarily provided by the complainant herself. It is also revealed that, at one point, both parties had an intention to marry each other, though this plan ultimately did not materialize,” the court said.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper