Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Jacqueline Fernandez knowingly involved in possession of proceeds of crime of conman, ED tells Delhi High Court

New Delhi, January 30 Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez, accused in a Rs 200 crore money-laundering case, was knowingly involved in the possession and use of proceeds of crime of alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has contended before...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 30

Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez, accused in a Rs 200 crore money-laundering case, was knowingly involved in the possession and use of proceeds of crime of alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has contended before the Delhi High Court.

The ED’s contention was made in an affidavit filed in response to Fernandez’s plea seeking quashing of an FIR against her in the money-laundering case allegedly involving Chandrasekhar.

Advertisement

The matter was listed before Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri and the counsel representing Fernandez sought time to file rejoinder in response to the ED’s affidavit.

The high court listed the matter for April 15.

Advertisement

In its reply, the ED claimed Fernandez never revealed the truth regarding the financial transactions with Chandrasekhar and always concealed facts until confronted with evidence.

“She continues to hold back the truth even till date. It is also a fact that Fernandez wiped out the entire data from her mobile phone after the arrest of Chandrasekhar, thereby tampering with the evidence. She also asked her colleagues to destroy the evidence. Evidence proves beyond doubt that she had been enjoying, using and is in possession of proceeds of crime. Thus, it is proved that Fernandez was knowingly involved in the possession and use of proceeds of crime of accused Chandrasekhar,” it said.

The agency said initially in her statements, the actor tried to cover up her conduct by claiming that she has been the victim of Chandrasekhar; however, during investigation, she failed to provide any substantial material to establish victimisation by him.

It said that she was aware of the criminal antecedents of Chandrasekhar, still she continued to receive, enjoy and possess proceeds of crime for herself and her family members.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper