Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Demolitions: Supreme Court defers hearing on contempt plea against Gujarat authorities

The Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred hearing on a contempt plea against the Gujarat authorities for allegedly illegally demolishing residential and religious structures in the state despite an interim stay and without its prior nod. A Bench of Justices BR...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred hearing on a contempt plea against the Gujarat authorities for allegedly illegally demolishing residential and religious structures in the state despite an interim stay and without its prior nod. - File photo
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Wednesday deferred hearing on a contempt plea against the Gujarat authorities for allegedly illegally demolishing residential and religious structures in the state despite an interim stay and without its prior nod.

A Bench of Justices BR Gavai, PK Mishra and KV Viswanathan listed the plea after three weeks.

The plea seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the state authorities for alleged violation of the apex court’s September 17 order that there would be no demolition of properties, including of those accused of crimes, across the country without its permission.

Advertisement

At the outset, a lawyer sought pass over of the hearing on behalf of the solicitor general representing the state authorities.

Senior lawyer Sanjay Hegde, appearing for the petitioner, said the state had filed a response to the petition and he wanted to file the rejoinder submissions.

Advertisement

“Their defense is that the structure demolished was near the Arabian Sea. What prevented them from seeking permission from your lordships,” the senior lawyer said.

On October 4, the top court cautioned the authorities, saying it will ask them to restore the structures if it finds they acted in contempt of its recent order against such action.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper