Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

CJI DY Chandrachud interacts with ‘AI lawyer’, poses death penalty query

In a first-of-its-kind interaction, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud on Thursday interacted with an “AI lawyer” at the National Judicial Museum and Archive (NJMA) on the Supreme Court premises. CJI Chandrachud, who is demitting office on November 10,...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Is death penalty lawful, CJI asks AI : CJI DY Chandrachud interacts with an ‘AI lawyer’ at the SC complex, posing the question whether the death penalty is constitutional in the country. He got the reply in the affirmative. PTI
Advertisement

In a first-of-its-kind interaction, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud on Thursday interacted with an “AI lawyer” at the National Judicial Museum and Archive (NJMA) on the Supreme Court premises.

CJI Chandrachud, who is demitting office on November 10, asked the “AI lawyer” if the death penalty was constitutional in India.

“Yes, death penalty is constitutional in India. It is reserved for the rarest of rare cases as determined by the Supreme Court where the crime is exceptionally heinous and warrants such a punishment,” the ‘AI lawyer’ responded rather confidently, much to the amusement of the CJI and fellow Supreme Court judges and lawyers.

Advertisement

Earlier, the CJI inaugurated the National Judicial Museum and Archive on the Supreme Court premises. The museum has been set up in the vacant space where old judges’ library used to function.

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Ass ociation (SCAORA) boycotted the event.

Advertisement

Former SCBA president and senior advocate Vikas Singh wrote to CJI Chandrachud raising strong objections to the Supreme Court’s decision to convert old judges’ library into a public museum.

Singh expressed “deep pain and anguish” over infrastructure decisions that, according to him, have overlooked the pressing needs of the legal fraternity.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper