DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Byju’s case: SC reserves verdict on plea challenging nat’l law tribunal order

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the insolvency resolution professional (IRP) to maintain status quo and not to hold any meeting of the committee of creditors (CoC) in the matter pertaining to insolvency proceedings against ed-tech firm Byju’s. The top...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Photo for representational purpose only. PTI file
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the insolvency resolution professional (IRP) to maintain status quo and not to hold any meeting of the committee of creditors (CoC) in the matter pertaining to insolvency proceedings against ed-tech firm Byju’s.

The top court also reserved its verdict on a plea of US firm Glas Trust Company LLC against the verdict of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) setting aside the insolvency proceedings against Byju’s and approving its Rs 158.9 crore dues settlement with the BCCI.

“The arguments have concluded. The judgement is reserved. Until the judgment is pronounced, the interim resolution professional (IRP) shall maintain status quo and not hold any meeting of the committee of creditors (CoC),” a Bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said.

Advertisement

The interim direction was passed after senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the US firm, alleged Glas Trust Company LLC, which has more than 99 per cent stakes in the CoC, has been ousted from the CoC by the present IRP.

The IRP is appointed under the IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code) by the National Company Law Tribunal to temporarily manage the ailing company’s finances and his role is to conduct the corporate insolvency resolution process and assess the firm’s operations as a going concern.

Advertisement

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), resumed advancing his submissions and said there was nothing wrong with the settlement of the cricket body’s claim.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper