Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

High Court judges should be paid same salary, pension, rules SC

The court says whether high court judges were appointed from the bar or from the judicial service has no bearing on their position as they constituted ‘a homogenous class’ without any distinction after their appointment
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Holding that all High Court judges are one homogenous class of office holders, the Supreme Court said they must be extended the same service benefits including pension, without any discrimination.

A three-judge Bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said whether high court judges were appointed from the bar or from the judicial service had no bearing on their position as they constituted "a homogenous class" without any distinction after their appointment.

While hearing petitions over salary dues of Patna High Court judges, the top court said that any determination of the service benefits of sitting high court judges and their retirement benefits must take place on the principle of non-discrimination within judges who constituted one homogenous group.

Advertisement

"Article 216 does not distinguish on how High Court judges are appointed. Once appointed to the High court, all judges rank to par. Institution of the High Court consists of the Chief Justice and all other judges appointed and no distinction can be made on payment of salaries or for other benefits," said the Bench, which also included Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra.

Making a distinction between judges would fundamentally militate against a sense of homogeneity, it said.

Advertisement

Terming financial independence for judges a necessary ingredient for maintaining judicial independence, it said, "Neither Article 221(1) of the Constitution which empowers Parliament to determine the salaries of each of the high court's judges nor Article 221(2) contemplates that a discrimination can be made between the high court judges on the basis of the source where they are drawn.”

"Thus there can be no difference in payment of salaries or other benefits for judges just like that of civil servants. The salaries are derived from the consolidated fund of states. Pensions are charged from the Consolidated Fund of India. The principle of non-discrimination applies to how sitting and former judges are to be treated ...," the top court said.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper