Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Haryana fixes December 19 for hearing PIL against Saini’s appointment as CM

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today fixed December 19 for hearing a petition filed in public interest for quashing the appointment of Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini and 13 cabinet ministers on the ground of being “illegal and...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini. File photo
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court today fixed December 19 for hearing a petition filed in public interest for quashing the appointment of Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini and 13 cabinet ministers on the ground of being “illegal and unconstitutional”.

The petition against the Union of India, the state of Haryana, Saini, the ministers and other respondents was placed before the high court division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Anil Kshetarpal. The bench made it clear that the matter would be heard along with a related PIL filed earlier. The respondents would, on the date fixed, respond to the submissions made in the petition.

Among other things, advocate-petitioner Jagmohan Singh Bhatti stated that the appointments were arbitrary, a burden on the public exchequer and a set back to the austerity drive. He stated that the challenge was to the appointment of the newly sworn-in cabinet of the Haryana Government in violation of the Constitutional amendment.

Advertisement

Elaborating, he stated that the council of ministers in a state could not exceed 15 per cent of the total strength of the house. But in the present case, it exceeded 15 per cent of the total strength. Bhatti added the state of Haryana was having 90-member Legislative Assembly. As such, the total number of ministers in the state of Haryana, including the chief minister, could not exceed 13. The petitioner further submitted that the respondent-state, in addition to the ministers, also conferred the cabinet rank to Advocate-General, “thus exceeding 15 per cent of the total strength of the house illegally and arbitrarily”.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper