Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

One candidate, one seat

IN an effort to check wasteful expenditure, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has rightly recommended to the government changes in election laws to bar candidates from contesting more than one seat in both Lok Sabha and Assembly polls and...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

IN an effort to check wasteful expenditure, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has rightly recommended to the government changes in election laws to bar candidates from contesting more than one seat in both Lok Sabha and Assembly polls and impose a fine on candidates vacating their seat. The question remains related to the larger electoral reforms and the need for political parties to agree for change. Most candidates who contest more than one seat are the frontline leaders of their parties with a lot at stake, which, sometimes, can translate into a battle for their political future.

Curbing money and muscle power in elections has been a challenge for the ECI and the voting process has seen many changes of late, with the poll panel commendably adapting to the conditions to hold elections to Assemblies amid the Covid pandemic. Just as the EVMs did away with ballot paper and manual counting, the ECI is keen on ‘one candidate, one constituency’ because the candidature of major nominees in multiple constituencies leads to greater deployment of security forces and more election-related work for the administrative staff, apart from their routine duties.

The vacation of a seat can be because of genuine reasons like death or disqualification under legislation enacted by Parliament. For instance, in the case of Sangrur Lok Sabha bypoll to be held on

Advertisement

June 23, the seat fell vacant because the sitting MP contested the 2022 elections from Dhuri Assembly constituency and went on to become the Chief Minister. Amendments to the law in this regard, therefore, will have to be clear about the circumstances. Necessitating a byelection should not be a habit for the parties in pursuit of political objectives. It should merely be an exigency instead of profligacy. The poll panel has made efforts to contain the election expenditure. Making the erring candidate bear the cost of the byelection can be another step towards putting a check on wrongdoings.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper