Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

SC demands time-bound action on Delhi's solid waste crisis

Expressing concern over “unchecked waste accumulation at landfill sites, construction waste and the risk of fires at waste storage areas”, the Supreme Court has warned the authorities concerned of issuing “harsh orders” if the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, are...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
An MCD worker at the Ghazipur landfill site in New Delhi. file photo
Advertisement

Expressing concern over “unchecked waste accumulation at landfill sites, construction waste and the risk of fires at waste storage areas”, the Supreme Court has warned the authorities concerned of issuing “harsh orders” if the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, are not implemented in a time-bound manner.

While hearing a 1985 public interest litigation on pollution filed by lawyer-turned-environmental activist MC Mehta, a Bench led by Justice AS Oka has directed the Delhi Chief Secretary to call a meeting of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and other stakeholders and come up with a time-bound schedule for implementation of the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016.

“It is a matter of immense importance that the 2016 rules are implemented in their true letter and spirit in the capital city. As we have been noticing in other cases also, the 2016 rules have remained on paper. If in the territory of NCT of Delhi, there is a complete failure to implement the rules, one can imagine what must be happening in other cities,” the Bench, which also included Justice AG Masih, said in its November 11 order.

Advertisement

“All stakeholders must come together and file a common report before this court laying down the timelines for reporting compliance with the provisions of the 2016 rules. This exercise of holding a meeting and coming out with a common response shall be completed by December 13,” it said.

“If we find that all other authorities do not come together and tell us the time-bound schedule for implementation of the rules, the court may have to consider passing harsh orders,” it said, posting the matter for further hearing on December 16.

Advertisement

The Capital generates more than 11,000 tonnes of solid waste every day, while the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) has the capacity to process only 8,073 tonnes. Pulling up the MCD for a “sorry state of affairs” with regard to implementation of the 2016 rules, it had earlier asked the Union Environment Secretary to convene a meeting of MCD and Delhi Government officials to find a solution.

On October 18, the MCD told the Supreme Court that by 2026 it would exceed its capacity of processing 11,000 tonnes of solid waste generated daily in the Capital. “By 2026, we will not only be able to meet the new waste generated on a daily basis but also be ahead of it by 3,000 tonnes a day. We have started the tender process and in the next two weeks, we will be able to finalise the bids for the purpose,” it had submitted.

However, in its November 11 order, the Bench said, “On one hand, there is no implementation of the 2016 rules as a result of which the garbage/solid waste is being illegally stored in landfill sites which are prone to fires and, on the other hand, there are a large number of construction activities going on in the state, which obviously adds to generation of solid waste and construction waste as well.”

It said, “The Delhi Government must come out with the figures for the daily generation of solid waste in the city while submitting the report. If the involvement of any department of the Government of India is required in the implementation of the 2016 rules, we authorise the Special Secretary of the Environment Department of the Delhi Government to call the officers concerned of the Union of India for the meeting. If the Special Secretary finds that any of the stakeholders are not cooperating, we permit him to move an application to this court to seek directions.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper