Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Coaching centre deaths in Delhi: Court rejects bail pleas of SUV driver, basement co-owners; says offence serious

It said the basement earmarked for parking and household storage being used for commercial purposes was in “complete violation of law”
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The court said that the plea was “untenable at this stage”. Photo for representation: iStock
Advertisement

New Delhi, July 31
Terming the offence as “serious”, a Delhi court on Wednesday denied bail to an SUV driver for his alleged role in drowning of three civil services aspirants at a reputed coaching centre here, saying the plea was “untenable at this stage”.

The court also rejected the bail pleas of the four basement co-owners Tejinder Singh, Parvinder Singh, Harvinder Singh, and Sarabjeet Singh, saying the investigation was still at a “nascent stage”. It said the basement earmarked for parking and household storage being used for commercial purposes was in “complete violation of law”.

The denial of bail by the local court came hours after a Delhi High Court bench headed by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan castigated the police for its “strange” probe by arresting the driver.

Advertisement

“What is the Delhi Police doing? Have they lost it? What are its officials who are monitoring the probe doing? This is a cover up or what?” the high court said in the forenoon while hearing a PIL seeking a probe into the incident.

Rejecting the bail plea, Judicial Magistrate Vinod Kumar said, “the perusal of the CCTV footage of the alleged incident shows that the accused can be seen driving the said vehicle on an already heavily waterlogged road at such a speed causing large displacement of water as a result of which the gate of the alleged premises gave way and the water went into the basement and consequently three innocent lives have been lost in the said incident.”

Advertisement

The magistrate said the video footage “prima facie” showed that Manuj Kathuria was warned by some passersby not to drive fast.

“But he did not pay any heed. The allegations against the accused are serious in nature. This court has been apprised that the investigation is still underway and the role of other civic agencies are also being thoroughly probed. The investigation is at its nascent stage,” the court said.

Terming the bail plea “untenable at this stage”, the court rejected it and said the decision was taken keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case as well as seriousness of the offences.

The four co-owners have been charged with abetting the offences.

“The allegations levelled against the accused persons are that they are the joint owner of premises i.e, basement. A perusal of the lease deed dated June 5, 2022, executed between the accused persons and the alleged coaching institute shows that the leased premises were being used for commercial purposes contrary to the conditions of the completion-cum-occupancy certificate issued by North Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) in complete violation of law,” the magistrate said.

Earlier, Additional Public Prosecutor Atul Srivastava had opposed the bail, saying according to the NDMC’s completion-cum-occupancy certificate dated August 9, 2021, permission had been given for the use of the basement “for parking use and household storage only”.

Amit Chadha, counsel for the accused persons, had argued that the only liability of his clients was that they were joint owners of the basement and according to the lease agreement, the entire responsibility for maintenance was on the lessee (coaching institute).

“Various civic agencies, for example, MCD, fire service and Delhi Police are responsible for the alleged tragedy and no liability can be imposed upon the accused persons,” he claimed.

Police have registered an FIR under Sections 105 (culpable homicide), 106(1) (death of any person by doing any rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide), 115(2) (punishment for voluntarily causing hurt) and 290 (negligent conduct with respect to pulling down, repairing or constructing buildings) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper