Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
  • ftr-facebook
  • ftr-instagram
  • ftr-instagram
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Shell out up to 2.5 times more for water in Chandigarh now

Sandeep Rana Chandigarh, March 30 Brace for shelling out 1.5 to 2.5 times more on your existing water bill from April onwards as the UT Administration today issued a notification regarding the water tariff, which was last year put on...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Sandeep Rana

Chandigarh, March 30

Advertisement

Brace for shelling out 1.5 to 2.5 times more on your existing water bill from April onwards as the UT Administration today issued a notification regarding the water tariff, which was last year put on hold till March 31 this year citing Covid-19.

Though the Administration has brought down the rates in two of the four slabs, it has increased the annual rates from the current 3 per cent to 5 per cent. It has also kept the sewerage cess, which was raised to 30 per cent on the total water bill in 2020, unchanged. As per the existing provision, notified on September 11, 2020, that was put on hold in May 2021, the 0-15 kilolitre (KL) water use slab rate, which was Rs2/kl, was raised to Rs3/kl.

Advertisement

Similarly, the 16-30 kl slab rate, which was charged at Rs4/kl, was raised to Rs6/kl; 31-60 kl slab rate was increased from Rs6/kl to Rs12/kl; and the above 60 kl slab rate was raised from Rs8/kl to Rs24/kl.

Now, as per the notification issued today, the first two slabs will have the same revised rates. However, in the wake of a demand for reducing the water rates, the Administration brought down the 31-60 kl slab rate from Rs12/kl to Rs10/kl and the above 60 kl slab rate from Rs24/kl to Rs20/kl.

To justify the hike in the rates, a communiqué from the Administration read, “It must be noted that the water tariff was not revised for the past 10 years i.e. since May 24, 2011. The cost of water supply and additional infrastructure has increased manifold since then, leading to continuous losses to the Municipal Corporation. In spite of the present notified rates, there are still losses of over Rs80 crore in the water supply and sewerage sectors.”

It further stated, “The rates in the first two slabs are comparable or even lower than those in Punjab and Haryana. The water tariff in the higher categories in Chandigarh is much lower than Delhi i.e. Rs10/kl and Rs20/kl vis-à-vis Rs43.93/kl. The sewerage cess in Chandigarh is 30 per cent of the water volumetric charges and is much lower than Delhi, which is 60 per cent.”

However, the revision of rates does not seem to have gone down well with some residents, who expressed displeasure, and also with the Opposition, which is slamming the BJP that rules the MC.

RK Garg, president of the Second Innings Association, said, “Residents have been cheated and poll promises have gone down the drain. There is no one to listen to people as there is no control over the bureaucracy. The ruling party is spineless and the Opposition is helpless.”

Pardeep Chhabra, Chandigarh co-incharge, AAP, said, “The rates were put on hold till March 31 as part of the BJP’s election stunt. They are liars and today, their real face has been exposed.

The hike is an unnecessary burden on the people.”

Subhash Chawla, president, city Congress, said, “It is a huge burden on the people. The Congress will soon hold a meeting to chalk out its agitation programme against the water tariff hike.”

Ruling BJP not heard

The Administration did not even consider the BJP-ruled MC House resolution of March last year.

The BJP, which had a stout majority in the previous term, had passed a revised agenda to bring the 31-60 kl slab rate to Rs9/kl and the above 60 kl slab rate to Rs16/kl. It had also approved that the sewerage cess be slashed from 30 per cent to 5 per cent, commercial units be charged for actual consumption at the rate of Rs25/kl and one-time 5 per cent annual hike after every three years. None of these points was considered.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper