Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Chandigarh furniture neither antiquity, nor art treasure: ASI

Tribune News Service Chandigarh, January 5 Responding to a letter to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the Ministry of Culture about auctioning of Chandigarh’s heritage furniture in France on December 12, the ASI stated: “The objects in question...
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, January 5

Responding to a letter to the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the Ministry of Culture about auctioning of Chandigarh’s heritage furniture in France on December 12, the ASI stated: “The objects in question do not come under the definition of ‘Antiquity’ or ‘Art Treasure’ as described in the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972.”

Advertisement

On December 8, Ajay Jagga, member of the UT’s Heritage Items Protection Cell, sent a representation to the Indian authorities, requesting them to stop the auction of UT’s heritage furniture, which was to be held in France on December 12, 2021.

The ASI responded on December 25, stating that UT’s heritage furniture does not come under the definition of antiquity or art treasure as described in the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Hence, the Archaeological Survey of India may not be able to take any action.

Advertisement

An additional submission was filed by Jagga in Rajya Sabha today regarding the ASI’s response. He wrote: “The Archaeological Survey of India’s response proves that there has to be clear legal position in such scenario like some guidelines/procedures or the commerce ministry issues a notification prohibiting the sale/ disposal/removal /export of Chandigarh heritage objects, on the lines of the MHA letter of 2011.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Home tlbr_img2 Opinion tlbr_img3 Classifieds tlbr_img4 Videos tlbr_img5 E-Paper