ENTERTAINMENT
The many hues of India
A recent film series hosted by TIFF Cinematheque in Toronto explored western filmmakers’ infatuation with the subcontinent 
Saibal Chatterjee

The continuing engagement of European and American directors with India, both as physical location and metaphorical conceit, was the theme of a three-week-long film series hosted by TIFF Cinematheque in Toronto’s Bell Lightbox.


L’intouchable

The nine-film exposition held recently was titled Passages to India: India Seen by Outsiders. It turned the spotlight on a slew of much discussed Indian forays made by celebrated western directors over a period of a nearly half a century.

The attempt was to understand the varied impulses and approaches that have informed these cinematic explorations. The selection ranged from 1947’s Oscar-winning Black Narcissus, filmed on a British soundstage by Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger, to contemporary French director Benoit Jacquot’s 2006 drama L’intouchable (The Untouchable), shot documentary-style on real locations in Varanasi.

Western filmic takes on India span a wide array of narrative forms, form ethnographic observation to febrile dramatisation designed to underscore the visual beauty, the heat and dust and the bewildering contradictions of the land.

The River
The River

From the German silent film The Indian Tomb (1921) and the French production The Hindu Soul (1929) to the current crop of films such as Life of Pi, Eat Pray Love, The Darjeeling Limited and The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, India has figured in varied ways in the global cinematic consciousness.

Phantom India
Phantom India
Nocturne Indien
Nocturne Indien
The Indian Tomb
The Indian Tomb

Over the decades, in The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, Gunga Din, Bhowani Junction, A Passage to India, Gandhi and Slumdog Millionaire, India has provided a constantly changing backdrop to many American and European films, though not always with happy results.

Inspired by Outsider Films on India 1950-1990, a book edited by film curator Shanay Jhaveri and published by Mumbai’s Shoestring Publishers in 2010, Passages to India highlighted the works of eight filmmakers, including Jean Renoir, Fritz Lang, Roberto Rossellini and Louis Malle.

Four parts of Malle’s controversial mini-series Phantom India, first
telecast in 1969 in France and the UK, and Rossellini’s masterfully crafted India: Matri Bhumi, filmed a decade earlier, provided divergent takes on the subcontinent.

While Malle’s documentary series was flayed by some as being too negative and one-sided and lacking in compassion, the French filmmaker himself regarded Phantom India as his most personal work.

Jhaveri puts the uproar in perspective: "Phantom India provoked displeasure as it seemed to be portraying aspects of India that the government was not too pleased with. We have to remember that in the few decades after Indian independence, the leadership was invested in projecting a modernising India."

He adds: "Some of the representations (in Phantom India) while not being outwardly or even at all critical might have been perceived as such."

At the other end of the spectrum is the western filmmaker’s abiding fascination for the river Ganges and the ancient holy city of Varanasi that stands on its bank. They appear in many of the films screened in Toronto in July.

Jhaveri was in the Canadian city to introduce two of the films in the package — American anthropologist and ethnographic filmmaker Robert Gardner’s contemplative 1985 documentary Forest of Bliss and L’intouchable, about a young Parisian actress, who sets out for the banks of the Ganges in search of the Indian father she never met.

A quest is also at the heart of Alain Corneau’s Nocturne Indien, in which a young Frenchman travels to India too look for a missing friend.

Tiger of Eschnapur
Tiger of Eschnapur

Gardner’s acclaimed Forest of Bliss, shot over the course of 24 hours — from one sunrise to the next — captures the everyday lives of denizens of Varanasi and explores the lanes and crematoria of the city. The provocative film, which is without any commentary or dialogue, transports viewers into a world that elicits both elation and gloom.

"Varanasi," says Jhaveri, "easily appeals to an outsider’s mind which thinks of India as old, spiritual, wedded to tradition and unchanging`85 (But) the responses to Varanasi vary. There are certainly very dedicated bodies of work that have been realised on the city." The hotly and consistently debated Forest of Bliss is certainly one such film.

Also in the Passages to India programme was a restoration of Jean Renoir’s masterly 1951 film The River, adapted from a Rumer Godden novel about three women growing up on the Ganges. Besides being the inspiration behind Wes Anderson’s decision to film in India (The Darjeeling Limited, 2007), The River is credited with drawing Satyajit Ray, then in the world of advertising, to the magic of cinema.

Like Black Narcissus, based on the Rumer Godden novel of the same name set in a remote convent of nuns in the Himalayas, writer and director Marguerite Duras’ India Song (1975) wasn’t filmed in India.

Based on Duras’ own play about the adulterous wife of a French diplomat in India, the film was shot in a mansion in Paris. India Song is generally regarded as her crowning achievement as a filmmaker. Also screened was Lang’s two-part self-titled Indian Epic (1959) — The Tiger of Eschnapur and The Indian Tomb — completing a veritable cinematic tapestry.

 



Diljit on a role
Actor singer Diljit Dosanjh has been getting much critical acclaim for his performance in Punjab 1984
Jasmine Singh

He is not swept by glamour. No amount of appreciation can give him wings, even though the audience has given him a thumbs up for his performance in Punjab 1984.

Diljit Dosanjh in Punjab 1984
Diljit Dosanjh in Punjab 1984

Actor singer Diljit Dosanjh likes to call himself a non-actor. "I didn’t learn acting. I still feel I can’t act much," he modestly puts across.

Diljit’s role in Punjab 1984 directed by Anurag Singh, has definitely brought him under spotlight and he’s won much critical acclaim for it. As he sifts through the messages on his phone, Diljit shares how he feels after the success of the film and how he would want to chart the course of his film graph now.

Punjab 1984 is a heart-wrenching story of mother and son caught in the riots. Did you expect the film to get such appreciation?

Anurag Singh, the director of the film, was absolutely clear about what he wanted from the film and from my role. I only went along with Anurag’s vision. Though I knew that it was a well-made film and would get noticed but I wasn’t prepared for the kind of response it got. I was thrilled to read tweets by Mahesh Bhatt and Anupam Kher appreciating the film. Even Bollywood has noticed this film and are talking good about it.

How did you prepare yourself for the role? Did you meet real-life victims of the families and share their experiences?

Punjab 1984 is not a film. It is an experience I lived through almost everyday of the shoot. I discovered so much more about myself during the shoot. Today, when I look back at my role in Punjab 1984, I still can’t believe that I could have done something like this. It was tough preparing for the role, both mentally as well as physically. I had to learn to handle weapons, besides work hard to keep my emotional balance intact.

The critical and commercial success of Punjab 1984 might bring in a new era of filmmaking? Do you think we are ready to move towards realistic subjects?

It is the subject of the film that makes a film good or bad. If we have good subjects, which are put together nicely, why wouldn’t the audience watch it? Punjabi cinema has no dearth of realistic subjects. It is probably the right time to bring these out of the closet. After all, it is the same Punjabi audience that likes to watch well-made films like Paan Singh Tomar and Queen.

Do you think you have proved yourself as a versatile actor after Punjab 1984?

Earlier, people would often tell me that I am cut for comic roles because I am funny and easy-going in real life. I didn’t react to it, I just went ahead and did Jatt & Juliet and it worked! Now, people tell me that I can do ‘serious’ kind of roles. I don’t know what to say. As I said, as an actor, I am exploring different subjects that can trigger something in me.

Do we see you in another serious role now?

Just because I did an emotional role in Punjab 1984, I am not going to just do such roles. I am open to doing action, romance and comedy as long as I am convinced with my character. My next film is an out-an-out commercial film.

You are also an established singer. How do you balance singing and acting?

I concentrate on one thing at a time. In the coming 15 days, I will only be working on my music. Once I am through with it, I’ll start working on my next film and then I wouldn’t touch music.





HOME