The year saw erosion in the credibility of the government, ineffectiveness of Parliament and the rise of civil society spearheaded by Team Anna. Hazare’s stock rose when after his fast, the Central Government appeared to buckle under
In many ways, 2011 will be remembered in India as the year of a diminutive, 74-year-old grassroots crusader who channelised the disgust of people at large over rampant corruption in the country into a powerful movement. Anna Hazare, the never-say-die activist, was a veritable nightmare during the year for the Manmohan Singh government, which was passing through a phase of widespread public disillusionment over corruption scandals. To an Opposition that was groping and failing to capitalise on the government’s misdeeds and misgovernance, Anna showed how people could be mobilised for a cause.
His stock rose manifold when a fasting Anna Hazare was whisked away to Tihar Jail. The government soon realised its folly, but the damage was done. It then capitulated, agreeing to the constitution of a joint committee of government and civil society representatives, which it had been resisting until then. By the time the year approached its end, however, many began to question Anna’s ‘overkill.’ Having galvanised the government into action by keeping its date with the Lokpal Bill for which Team Anna had set an ambitious deadline, Team Anna’s nitpicking and constant nagging did not go down well with many in the predominantly middle-class movement. This came in the backdrop of a systematic campaign, evidently inspired by the government, which sought to puncture the credibility of vocal members of Team Anna like Prashant Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Kiran Bedi. However, there is no denying that a Bill that was hibernating for 42 years because successive governments lacked the will and the people, at large, the drive to get it through, now stands on the threshold. There have been some bones of contention like the accountability of the lower bureaucracy to the Lokpal and the Prime Minister’s immunity from prosecution on which the government has finally given in, but control over the CBI is a sticking point, which has potential for fresh escalation. While the right of Parliament to legislate is unexceptionable, Team Anna is pressing on, and may still be able to force the government to give in further. Indeed, there can be little doubt that Team Anna, whatever its vulnerabilities, has shown the power of civil society on issues that agitate the minds of the people. It has also bared the inadequacies of the Opposition, in general, which is devoid of a leader who can capture public imagination. During 2011, Parliament slipped further in public perception with frequent walkouts, boycotts and adjournments making the august body look so utterly ineffective and devoid of purposefulness. Vital Bills, which should have been debated thoroughly, were either postponed as the Opposition forced adjournments or adopted without adequate debate and application of mind. As key pillars of democracy, the judiciary and media also had their share of triumphs and tragedies during the year. The Supreme Court evoked frowns as some judges chose to pass scathing comments on key public figures, including the Prime Minister, in the course of hearings. But there was a sense of elation at politicians and senior bureaucrats being called to account for their acts of omission and commission. The likes of former minister A. Raja, Member of Parliament Kanimozhi and sports administrator Suresh Kalmadi were made to cool their heels in jail for months in what seemed a clear departure from the past. The media got enmeshed in the ‘paid news’ controversy and the general decline in ethics in the face of rampant sensationalism brought down the prestige of the Fourth Estate. Yet, there were some positives for it during the year, as it was not the Opposition but the media that unmasked several corruption scandals. Nationally, this was also the year of steep price increases and a perceptible slowdown in the economy. All in all, 2011 in India was a year of erosion in the credibility of the government, of lost opportunities for the Opposition and of the new-found power of civil activism.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||