Living history
Perched on a hilltop beside the Tawi and facing the city of Jammu, Bahu fort, with its sprawling buildings, containing royal mansions, has been a mute witness to the culture and life of people, writes
Suraj Saraf
The
fort and town of Bahu stand on the eastern side of Jammu city on
the left bank of the Tawi, overlooking the river. The fort still
bears appearance of great strength and was famous in former
times, as we learn from authors, say renowned archaeologist and
ideologist J. Ph. Vogel and Hutchison in their History of the
Punjab Hill States.
A view of Jammu city and the Mubarak Mandi heritage
complex from Bahu fort |
Perched
imposingly on a hilltop beside the river and facing the capital
city of Jammu, on the other side of the Tawi, this fort, with
its strong and sturdy walls and sprawling buildings, containing
also royal mansions, has been a mute witness to the hoary and
eventful history of the twin habitations of Jammu city and Bahu
town. Forts, indeed, have been a living history, culture and
life of the people inhabiting these priceless fortifications
everywhere.
From the
earliest period, the capital of the Jammu-ruling dynasty was at
Bahu, and the rajas remained in this strong fort,
according to History of the Punjab Hill States.
It says Jammu
was much more open to attacks, being on the very edge of the
plains, and lying right in the way of advancing and retreating
armies.
History
highlights quite a few such invasions in pre/post-Christian era
during which Bahu fort also finds a mention. Apart from the
reason mentioned above for invasions on Jammu, it is certain
that the prosperity of the area attracted invaders from distant
places. This prosperity is much reflected in the account of his
invasion by Timur in Malfuzat-i-Timuri, wherein he
mentions tremendous loot in Jammu and its surrounding villages.
He also refers to the strong Bahu fort.
Even Ferishta
mentions (as referred to in Elliot’s history) an invasion of
the Jammu hills by Kanauj ruler Ram Dev Rathore. It says:
"Confident in the valour of his army, the strength of his
fortress (Bahu), the difficulty of access, the denseness of
jungle and abundance of his supplies, the raja of Jammu refused
to surrender but was defeated in the fight and forced to make
peace with the invader."
According to
the genealogical tree or Vansavali of the erstwhile Dogra ruling
dynasty of Jammu and Kashmir, it belonged to the Suryabansi clan
of the Kashatriyas and was founded by one Agnibaran (descended
from Rama’s son Kush) migrating from Ayodhya. He settled at
Parol, now in Kathua district of Jammu province. His
descendants, off and on, began conquering the areas around.
In the seventh
generation Bahu Lochan seized the Bahu area (previous name
perhaps Dhara Dagri but later named after him as Bahu) and
started ruling there.
He got the Bahu
fort-cum-palace constructed. His younger brother Jambu Lochan
was one day on a hunting spree across the Tawi and saw a lion
and a goat drinking water from the same pond. He later settled
there, naming the area after himself — Jambu (known that way
till late the 17th century), which later turned into Jammu.
Bahu rulers and
Madra Desh (Sialkot and adjoining areas, now in Pakistan), being
neighbours, often encroached on each other’s territories. In
the account of those battles, Bahu fort is often mentioned.
Salim Shah Sur
of Sur dynasty of India is also said to have seized Bahu fort in
the mid 16th century for some years.
It is curious
that despite the long existence of Bahu fort, history tells once
only its having been attacked (by Salim Sur). Was it so because
Jammu city had become more important and the fort had become
merely its adjunct? The rulers had settled down in Jammu city,
first at Purani Mandi and then at Mubarak Mandi (which is now
being developed as a grand heritage complex by the Centre).
As mentioned in the history
book, Duggar (Jammu) state is ancient but no mention of it is
found in any document prior to the 11th century. It
is a matter of considerable surprise that no mention of Jammu is
found in Rajatrangani, and the explanation probably is
that Jammu did not become the capital of the state till at a
later period. The original capital was at Bahu but it seems to
have been changed for a time in the 11th century to Babbapur.
|