|
|
|
|
| SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY |
|
|
|
Future of flight: Fuel for thought Trends
THIS UNIVERSE |
|
|
Future of flight: Fuel for thought It took just 32 seconds to extinguish faith in the airship and the hydrogen that once buoyed the Hindenburg, which erupted in a fatal inferno 70 years ago. Now hydrogen has been ditched again by the flight industry. But this time the promised “green” fuel for powering flights of the future has been quietly shelved in favour of biofuels and more fuel-sipping aviation. “Hydrogen isn’t getting a serious look in now by aircraft and engine manufacturers. It is unlikely to meet anything near to standards required for safe operation of aircraft,” says Christopher Surgenor, editor and publisher of GreenAir, an online publication focused on aviation and the environment. “There are very stringent conditions, naturally, attached to jet fuels — freeze points, flash points, etc. Then there is also the question of infrastructure: how would the hydrogen fuel be stored, transported, etc; it would require a plant the size of a power station by every airport.” And while hydrogen as a potential “greener” fuel gets dumped worldwide, airlines and manufacturers are also jettisoning their once radical ideas for hydrogen-burning “cryoplanes”. Should we be concerned? The aviation industry clearly is. Because whatever fuel becomes the de facto power for all tomorrow’s flights, the future of the passenger jet as we know it is doomed. Facing a fate shared by other fossil-fuel guzzlers, the jet will have to find alternatives to burning kerosene if it is to survive beyond the middle of the next century, which is when, according to the most optimistic figures, the Earth gives up its final barrel of oil. Hydrogen was hoped to provide the fuel for the next generation of passenger jets, or cryoplanes. Now those hopes are dashed. Three times more efficient than oil but four times bulkier — even in its liquid state — hydrogen already powers several prototype cryoplanes around the world. But, despite the billions poured into research, their promised commercialisation has come to nothing as hydrogen failed to prove itself any greener then other energy sources. “The energy costs of making hydrogen are enormous,” says Professor Ian Poll, head of technology for the UK Government-funded sustainable aviation Omega organisation. “It has to be created with an awful lot of energy. We need a source of electricity that does not emit CO2, and there are not many of those around.” He points out that when world oil prices were pegged at $70-85 a barrel, alternative fuels were, until recently, simply not viable and could not compete economically. But just 12 years ago, experts and much of the aircraft industry seemed bullish about hydrogen’s chances as the new super-fuel. Generated from hydropower, liquid hydrogen, they thought, would be the ultimate non-polluting fuel source that, with some modification, be readily used by today’s aircraft. Radical redesign of the world’s airline fleet was planned to carry the bulky liquefied gas. The result was to be new-look cryojets reminiscent of Thunderbird 2 — with short wings and a bulging fuselage. Millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money has been funnelled into projects that seemingly did not take on board the fact that hydrogen power would remain costly and polluting. From 2000, Airbus was involved with the 26-month EC-funded Cryoplane Project to assess the feasibility of hydrogen, in its bid to develop a zero carbon-emissions aircraft. Researchers found that aircraft would require fuel tanks four times larger than today’s. Models showed that the larger exterior surface areas would increase energy consumption by well over a tenth, and operating costs by around 5 per cent. The greatest problem has been one of storing the cumbersome hydrogen while keeping a plane’s aerodynamic properties. The answer, according to engineers at Daimler-Benz Aerospace, who built a small demonstration jet, is to set the fuel tank above the passenger compartment. Which might make passengers, nursed under tonnes of deep-frozen and highly inflammable hydrogen, slightly nervous. They needn’t be, said the experts “The arrangement of the tanks permits both cabin and cargo compartment to remain undisturbed, and in the event of an accident or leak, the hydrogen could escape upwards. Several years ago, tests by Nasa demonstrated that hydrogen presents only little danger to passengers, even in crash cases,” says Daimler-Benz Aerospace spokesman Rolf Brandt. “Kerosene is a very good fuel and very difficult to compete with,” explains Rainer von Wrede, of Airbus’s research and technology department. “In principle, it is possible to fly with hydrogen and we have a proof of concept, but now we can not produce enough hydrogen in an environmentally friendly manner for aviation.” Airbus, and the aviation industry, is devoting its research to reducing consumption and committing to developing what it calls greener synthetic kerosene and leaner planes and engines. Hydrogen, nuclear-powered planes, solar and electric powered commercial aircraft have all been shelved for the short- to mid-term. “The big deal is alternative jet fuels. Principally biofuels that come from sustainable sources, and do not compete with food and water,” says Mr Surgenor. “They must be ‘drop-in’ — in other words no major, if any, changes to aircraft engines and no changes to existing fuel transportation systems. Alternative fuels include coal-to-liquid (CTL) and gas-to-liquid jet fuels that are now fully certified in 50-50 blends, although CTL jet fuels have been in use at South African airports for many years.” Given the long product cycles in aviation, if the airlines don’t want to see themselves grounded in the next millennium, they might be wise to convert to alternatives sooner than later.
—The Independent Other Fuels That Could Power Planes Bio fuels: biomass-to-liquid
(BTL) Ongoing experiments to make fuel are using everything from algae to logging waste to garbage as a source. Until five years ago, biofuels had not been thought technically viable as a replacement for jet kerosene. Now considered the best way to ensure a sustainable green future for the aviation industry, they are expected to be certified for commercial airline use in 50-50 blends within the next six months. The downside Coal-to-liquid
(CTL) The downside Gas-to-liquid
(GTL) GTL has the same CO2 lifecycle as conventional jet fuel, although it scores high in local air-quality terms, owing to no sulphur and reduced particulate emissions and it can utlilise the usually burnt-off methane from oil drilling platforms. The downside |
|
Trends
HONG KONG: China may have unwittingly introduced swine flu viruses when it imported pigs from Europe and North America for breeding over the past few decades, researchers said. Three virus families are endemic in pigs in southern China and one of them — the Eurasian avian-like H1N1 flu virus from Europe — is viewed as most threatening because humans have no antibodies against it, said the researchers, who published their findings in Nature magazine on Thursday. Despite advances in science, tornadoes take deadly toll CHICAGO: It is one of the terrible paradoxes of this spring’s deadly spate of U.S. tornadoes. Engineers know how to build shelters that provide extensive protection from tornadoes, and weather forecasting advances make it easier than ever for experts to predict, spot and track twisters. — Reuters |
|
THIS UNIVERSE Do electrons, protons and neutrons have any colour? If yes, please explain? You have asked me about the colour of elementary particles like electrons, protons, etc. I think this is because the word ‘colour’ is beginning to be used in particles physics to denote specific quantum numbers. This started because of playfulness of creative scientists like Murray Gellman. But if I were to stay away from the world of quarks, where we still deal with virtual particles and not those that have made physical appearance, then I would say that you couldn’t define the colour of fundamental particles. You can, however, well define the physical colour of atoms and molecules. This colour is very specific to the atoms or molecules we are dealing with, even the specific states of those particles. Indeed such colours, and detailed spectra of astronomical objects enable us to determine their chemical composition and temperature distribution. If the speed of light changes with the change of medium, then how can we say that the speed of light is constant in the universe? We only say that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. It can be different in different media. |
It took just 32 seconds to extinguish faith in the airship and the hydrogen that once buoyed the Hindenburg, which erupted in a fatal inferno 70 years ago. Now hydrogen has been ditched again by the flight industry. But this time the promised “green” fuel for powering flights of the future has been quietly shelved in favour of biofuels and more fuel-sipping aviation.
