Mega-buck art
Indian artists are fetching
big money in the international market. Nonika
Singh checks out if these sky-high prices are just a
flash in the pan
With crores
becoming the new benchmark at art auctions around the world, the
buzzword in the artistic circles for some time has been money
and big-time money at that. After all, 2010 saw legendary artist
S. H. Raza break all conceivable records when his Saurashtra
sold for Rs 16.3 crore at the Christies in London. Bharti Kher’s
trademark bindi sculpture, The Skin Speaks a Language Not its
Own, was auctioned for a whopping Rs 6.9 crore. By the end of
the year, Arpita Singh’s mammoth mural, The Wish Dream, which
connoisseurs dub as equivalent to one solo show akin to 14
canvases put together, fetched Rs 9.6 crore....
Jitish Kallat’s Baggage Claim is part of the exhibition Indian Highway, currently on view at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Lyon |
Dinesh
Vazirnai, CEO of SaffronArt, says there is a strong
demand for works of highest quality. Not surprisingly, at least
80 per cent of the 100 modern Indian contemporary works were
sold for Rs 30 crore last year. An F. N. Souza painting fetched
Rs 1.4 crore, a S. H. Raza’s work Rs 1.5 crore and an M. F.
Husain piece of art Rs 1.2 crore.
So, is the
Indian art standing on a new threshold, all set to take a leap,
hitherto unheard of? Peter Nagy, owner of New Delhi-based
gallery Nature Morte, who has given to the art world significant
signatures like Subodh Gupta and Dayanita Singh, feels,
"There is a need to put things in a proper perspective. We
must not get carried away by a couple of international auction
prices, which do not reflect the big picture."
Peeved with the
media’s obsessive fixation with astronomical price tags, he
quips, "These are exceptions, not the norm. There are
thousands of artists still looking for gallery space. Don’t
forget that since 2008, there has been a big slump."
Besides, Nagy feels quite strongly that auction prices are not
the bottomline and certainly not an acid test for good art. He
reasons, "Good art, by its very nature, shall invariably be
outside the market."
Arpita Singh’s mammoth mural,
The Wish Dream, fetched Rs 9.6 crore |
Bharti Kher,
who and her husband Subodh Gupta, often referred to as power art
couple, may continue to outdo each other in the auction world.
But when it comes to prices, even Kher feels that there is a
need to look beyond the moolah at the art and the artist’s
intrinsic worth. Perhaps, amid the media hype about the price,
the artistic merit of her iconic sculpture, The Skin `85,that
Nagy calls "her most important work," took a backseat.
But are these
skyrocketing prices much ado about nothing? Tempting though it
may be to dismiss these pressure-cooker prices as just a
flash-in-the-pan phenomenon, the truth is more complex. Indeed,
on the one hand, there is a need to remember that the sky-high
auction prices have little bearing on an artist’s actual
market value. But on the other hand, feels Sunaina Anand,
director of New Delhi-based gallery, Art Alive, these prices are
a barometer of the growing confidence in the art market.
Globally, she feels, Indian artists are being increasingly
recognised and their art is being respected. Indeed, what else
can explain exhibitions like Indian Highway? Curated by Julia
Peyton-Jones and Hans Ulrich Obrist, directors, Serpentine
Gallery, and Gunnar B. Kvaran, director, Astrup Fearnley Museum,
the touring exhibition has only grown bigger since its first
took off in 2008. Part IV of this exhibition that includes 30
Indian artists is currently on view at the Museum of
Contemporary Art, Lyon. In 2009, Saatchi organised an
exhibition, The Empire Strikes Back, at Saatchi Gallery that was
dominated by contemporary Indian names, besides promising
artists from Pakistan.
The young
artist duo of Jiten Thukral and Sumir Tagra concur that the
new-wave artists, who have given birth to fresh flavour and
aesthetics, have made the Indian art more visible globally.
Anand, however, feels that it is unfair to credit just
half-a-dozen artists for the Indian presence on the global
stage. She says, "Indian art, like the country, is diverse
and it’s this diversity that is being accepted."
Paresh Maity, who works in conventional mediums, was invited by
the Culture Department of Chicago to put up a show |
Obrist, too,
agrees that the Indian art is not about one generation of
artists. Not surprising, Indian Highway included the legendary
M. F. Husain too, along with many young artists. If masters like
Raza, Souza and Husain have always created the buzz, today it is
the younger artists, who continue to make a mark. So, while you
have Pooja Iranna’s video selected for The Celeste Prize 2010,
Mithu Sen’s mixed media watercolour exhibition generates
excitement at Berlin. If Jitish Kallat exhibited at Chicago,
Paresh Maity, who works in conventional mediums, was invited by
the Culture Department of Chicago to put up a show. Besides,
Indian artists like Kher and Jagannath Panda are part of many
group shows where they are being seen as artists working in
interesting mediums minus the baggage of their nationality.
In short, there
is a movement that signals the strong presence of the Indian art
internationally. But there is no one kind of art that is making
waves but different genres. Indeed, many international galleries
are representing Indian artists from Sakshi Gupta to Sudarshan
Shetty to Vivek Sharma. So these are quite exciting times for
both the Indian art and artists. How much of it will translate
into real money and how many of these artists will prove to be a
blue-chip investment is hard to pinpoint. Considering the fact
that there are groups like Raqs media collective, who are
exhibiting all over Europe all the time, yet these groups do not
find enough buyers in India. Then there are those who are very
successful on home turf but
do not figure anywhere internationally.
Bharti Kher’s trademark bindi sculpture, The Skin Speaks a Language Not its Own, was auctioned for a whopping
Rs 6.9 crore |
The year 2010
anyway, feels Anand, was a mixed bag where buoyancy gave way to
a slowdown to finally arrive at stability. What is heartening,
she feels, is that the art market is progressing and moving
towards becoming an organised sector. This year ,the
private-public partnership that began last year could pave the
way for more resilience.
With the third
edition of the India Art Summit that evinced keen response both
from the participants and viewers, and with more exhibitions
like the largest exhibition of the contemporary Indian culture
in Europe slated for May at the Centre Pompidou in Paris, the
tidings are happy.
As for art as
investment, experts are not taking names. Masters will be
masters. Viren Tanwar, himself an artist who finds international
buyers, reminds, "Arpita Singh is no ordinary artist but
one with a complete journey behind her. Her work that fetched an
exorbitant price is one of exceptional quality." He is only
echoing what expert companies like Art Tactic assert; "Only
works of high-quality rarity sell well."
Besides the time-tested
veterans, younger artists could be the proverbial
low-investment-high-return bet. But the unanimous expert view is
that one must watch their evolution and finally make one’s own
visual connect. They also opine that it’s hard to predict the
future. However, they dwell on the need to keep the momentum
going. The Indian highway, which is being increasingly
represented by younger and cutting-edge artists, is in no mood
to stop anyway. Whether they will eventually change the art
world as Obrist proclaimed recently, however, remains to be
seen.
Boom
time
S. H. Raza
|
Peter Nagy may feel that
auction prices are not always transparent and can be
manipulated. However, nothing excites the Indian
imagination more than the jingle of money at the auction
houses. Thus the news — be it of Sobha Singh’s work
being auctioned at Sotheby’s or India-born Kashmiri
settled in London, Raqib Shaw’s work, fetching a record
price of $ 5.49 million in 2007 — is always heartening.
Indians rejoice and take it as a signal of our art,
creating its firm niche in the international market. More
so, when the buyers, as in the case of Kher’s elephant
sculptures, are not Indians but foreign collectors. The
Indian share in the international market may be negligible
compared to, say, art from China, but the Indian art
market, which was very young between 1995 and 2000, has
only grown. In fact, in the 1990s, there was no secondary
market. Between 2000 and 2008 prices multiplied manifold,
more so between 2004 and 2008 with auction prices
increasing from Rs 20 lakh to Rs 2 crore. While in 2008,
the stars were Subodh Gupta, Anish Kapoor and T. V.
Santosh, surprisingly in 2010, it were the modern artists,
who kept the Indian market buoyant. Art Tactic, a
London-based analysis firm, remarks that average auction
prices and volumes for modern Indian art are back to
levels seen at the peak in June 2008. Nagy, however, is
adamant, "Slump and boom are rather simplistic
assertions and auction prices are no guide to primary
pricing." — NS |
|