TELEPROMPT
Sania, Shoaib all over
Mannika
Chopra
THE hot topic of
discussion on the various channels this week has been the
ensuing Sania Mirza-Shoaib Malik wedding, and the claims of
Hyderabad-based Ayesha Siddiqui, who has been saying that the
Pakistani cricketer had married her 10 years earlier. TV news
has been overdosing on the impending wedding scheduled for
mid-April, often at the cost of other legitimate news spots. Too
much, too much, the couch potatoes groaned collectively, as they
watched yet another frame of Sania and Shoaib addressing the
press, countering the allegations of a bespectacled Ayesha, who
was always heard but never seen live on TV.
A wholesome Ayesha
(seen in still shots), supported by friends and family and a
sympathetic media, stuck to her guns and said that Shoaib not
only married her but she even became pregnant. Unfortunately,
she had a miscarriage. Of course, some channels apparently didn’t
know the difference between a miscarriage and an abortion, but
these were piffling details in the on-going saga of the great
wedding scandal. Suddenly, primetime news began looking like a
cross between E News and ESPN with assorted Pakistani cricketers
giving their views on the matter and repeated loops of Shoaib
Malik accepting congratulations on his ‘earlier’ wedding at
an international cricket match venue.
The Sania-Shoaib episode has the elements of a great media story
of love and betrayal
|
If smart people
wanted a haven from hard political news, this was the week. But
if you were addicted to stupidity, well, then you should have
watched India TV which, against the backdrop of Amar Chitra
Katha-type lurid graphics, posed 40 questions that the
police in Hyderabad asked Shoaib. Apparently, the Siddiqui
family had pressed criminal charges against Malik, resulting in
this Q and A approach on India TV.
Headline News
aired us some sneaky shots taken though a half-closed door of
the couple dancing. Back in the studio anchor Rahul Kanwar
interviewed a completely clueless Sanna Bhambri. The
not-so-famous tennis player said many, many times she didn’t
know what was going on and wondered how could Sania look so
happy and dance when such serious charges were being levelled
against her fianc`E9 (Question: Why get specialists who have
nothing special to say?). Even staid old DD News started of with
the Sania-Shoaib nuptials on the day there had been a blast at
the American consulate in Peshawar, killing 40 people.
Earlier on in an
exclusive footage, which was used, and surprise credited by
other channels, Star News caught the couple in the verandah of
Sania’s home. Shocking! Proving the exception to the rule,
NDTV 24X7 preferred to focus on the Food Security Bill, and
later the Right to Education. So was TV, yet again, in danger of
losing it? As Sagarika Ghoshe said in a perceptive discussion on
CNN-IBN’s Face the Nation on privacy and public lives,
the story had all the elements of a great media story — love,
betrayal woven into potentially the most famous Indo-Pak
wedding.
So why shouldn’t
the media go in overdrive? Besides, the Indo-Pak coverage of the
event propelled this routine celeb scandal story on to another
level. Being a Pakistani, Malik may have been consciously, or
unconsciously, painted as a duplicitous villain by the Indian
media. Interestingly, in Pakistan itself Ayesha was garnering
most of the public and media sympathy. lt took reality show
anchor Minnie Mathur and Zeenat Shaukat Ali, an Islamic scholar
from Mumbai, to spell it out. The excessive coverage of this tamasha
was out of focus, unnecessary and 10 days before a 24-year-old’s
wedding, a tad distasteful.
But long before
her first engagement to childhood friend Sohrab, and its
subsequent termination, and now her second betrothal, Sania has
never been far away from the headlines. As a young,
good-looking, promising tennis player — a promise which she
has never fulfilled — she has been the subject of intense
media scrutiny. Supremely articulate and with a noticeable
sartorial sense — short skirts and large hoop earrings — she
always had guaranteed celebrity status despite the fact that she
has been winning fewer and fewer tennis matches.
Like politicians,
celebrities need to be noticed by the public to stay in office
and retain their celeb status. And Sania has always been
noticed. So, for her to revolt against the presence of cameras,
and tell the media to calm down, is somewhat misplaced. But it
is equally misplaced for TV to pre-judge a situation, arm itself
with inadequate research and present rumour and innuendo as fact
and indulge in a quantum of coverage, which is completely
disproportionate to the news worthiness of a story.
|