TELEVISION

Hard words and soft probes
Clearly interviews are no more what they used to be, writes Randeep Wadehra

Rajdeep Sardesai
Rajdeep Sardesai

Barkha Dutt
Barkha Dutt

Karan Thapar
Karan Thapar

Vir Sanghvi
Vir Sanghvi

In the good old Doordarshan days interviews used to be feel good, cosy t`EAtes-`E0-t`EAtes wherein all sorts of nice things would be said of the guest – ignoring blots and warts. A nice makeover job that would not add much to the viewers’ knowledge but one while away the time. But then came cable TV with a host of private channels competing for public attention that have redefined TV interview.

In the strictest sense television interviews are anything but. Conventionally interviews are exchange of views between two persons with a view to assess one’s worth for a specific purpose. On a casual note it can also be described as a means of getting to know each other. But what we see on television today is much more substantial as it is conducted on a public platform in order to reveal the interviewee’s thoughts and personality to millions of viewers. To paraphrase Seneca – the Roman author of Epistles— a TV interview has a kind of charm about it, an insinuating and insidious something that elicits secrets from the interviewee just like love or liquor.

However, different interviewers have different ways of eliciting secrets. Prabhu Chawla on Aaj Tak’s Seedhi Baat hardly asks straight questions. He prefers to use syrupy adjectives and a sweet smile to lower the guard of his quarry before slipping in the innocuous sounding naughty question. Only seasoned, media savvy guests escape the trap. Normally they spill the beans, while some lose their shirt as did Vivek Oberoi on his romantic links with Aishwarya Rai. And he isn’t the only one to lose his cool and much else because Chawla’s baat is anything but seedhi.

On NDTV’s One On One Vir Sanghvi prefers to put straight posers. He doesn’t pull punches whether he is interviewing India’s strongest woman politician Sonia Gandhi or lesser mortals. Moreover, he has a propensity for sarcasm that makes one feel sorry for his victims. One still remembers his interview with the goody-goody Nafisa Ali on another channel years back wherein he almost convinced the lady that she was a misfit for the rough and tumble of the political world.

Shekhar Walk The Talk Gupta on the other and does not use any subterfuge or satire. He prefers to ask polite questions that relate to his guest’s specific area of interest. So, whether it is Shilpa Shetty or Sachin Tendulkar the conversation is generally relaxed and cogent. But, surprisingly, guests do reveal their true selves as did the Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackrey. Perhaps this is because Gupta allows maximum speaking time to his guests and seldom interrupts their train of thought. One of the beauties of his approach is polite deference even when he disagrees with his guest’s utterance.

This is something you cannot say of Karan Devil’s Advocate ‘Devil’s Advocate’ Thapar on CNN-IBN. He looks upon his guests as guilty until or unless proved otherwise. He harries them with uncomfortable questions, backs up his ‘charge sheet’ with incontrovertible evidence, interrupts them when they digress or become too loquacious, bludgeons them with verbal assaults into admitting whatever he wants them to admit.

No wonder you hear such chagrined exclamations as "this is no way to conduct an interview!" from Ram Jethmalani, the battle-scarred veteran of hot debates, when cornered on the Jessica Lal case; or "when you have invited me at least allow me to speak!" from a flustered, fiery Uma Bharti when repeatedly interrupted on her digressions; or "what sort of question is this?!" from a chary Andhra CM Rajasekhara Reddy when queried about his benami property and his attempts to browbeat the Press.

The no-nonsense Thapar fixes them all with a steady stare and a grimacing visage, which can be pretty unnerving for the hot-seat incumbent. Frisson ebbs and flows as sweat beads do an excruciatingly slow dance on frowning/sulking faces.





HOME