Saturday, November 18, 2006 |
For
some time now, I have been watching with fascination as well as
scepticism, competitions on various channels for singers and dancers.
The contestants, and this is the good thing about these contests, are
unknown people from remote corners of the country who come to a
metropolitan city to compete. And, some of the winners have been from
surprising places like Srinagar in J&K and Silchar in Assam. The
awards are given not just by an expert jury but are combined with a
popular vote. The judges are usually from the Mumbai film industry and
most of the contestants speak in Hindi and sing in Hindi. I hope the
South Indian, Bengali and other non-Hindi channels also run such
contests, otherwise it would be very unfair for non-Hindi speaking and
singing people. The ultimate presentation in front of the judges (there
are lakhs of entries) is held in the presence of an invited audience as
well as relatives and friends of the contestants. The camera frequently
pans over to the anxious as well as proud mamas, papas and teachers of
the singers or dancers. There is a lot of gurugiri, if I may coin
a term, with the contestants touching the feet of the judges, who tend
to be stern and cruel and make humiliating comments about those who do
not fare well and frequently reduce them to tears. There is no question
of challenging or asking for clarification about the judgements. But
sometimes the outside votes can add a controversial note, as happened
recently. If a contestant from Assam won largely because voters in his
state rallied round him, recently there has been quite an ugly
controversy about a dance contest. I might add that I was quite
surprised and, in fact, amused by some of the contestants who were
celebrities but teamed up with a good dancer to dance for the judges.
They were cricketer Ajay Jadeja, well-known singer Abhijit, a TV chef
called Sanjeev Kapoor and even Jassi under her real name. Towards the
end of the contest, it was found that a competitor had bought up a lot
of coupons, or whatever, for voters and while most people considered
this unethical, the contestant and her supporters did not. In the end,
the contest was won by Jassi under her real name Mona Singh and it was
obvious that she had won not because of any particular talent in dancing
but because of her role as Jassi, the girl next door, before she became
a glam puss and the whole serial lost its charm and popularity. And for
those of us viewers who are neither professionally nor emotionally
involved, these contests reduce themselves to a popularity contest for
the channel concerned and become a quick way of getting high viewership
figures. I have noticed for some time a distinct deterioration in
English anchoring on NDTV. Gone are the days when trainers from the BBC
and ITV used to come to Delhi to train the early batch of anchors, some
of whom went to the best national and international universities. Some
of them are now in top positions and show up the new batches for their
substandard qualities. One reason for the drop in standards, I think, is
that some of the best anchors have been switched over to NDTV Profit.
And, incidentally, NDTV’s Hindi anchors are still of very high
quality. I shall quote as examples, two anchors who appear in news
bulletins at prime time. Sunetra Choudhury is an excellent reporter
but she anchors the studio news like a walk in the park, with long
pauses, smiles and a generally casual and complacent air. As for Jyotsna
Mohan, she has never had much sense of punctuation, and she drops her
volume after an outside reporter has spoken loud and clear. She is
sometimes inaudible and there is a general air of confusion about her
anchoring. In the programme on Khan Market, while the captions
repeatedly mentioned that Khan Market had been evaluated as one of the
24 most expensive retail outlets globally, Jyotsna kept on saying it was
one of the most expensive markets in Delhi. Unforgivable. With
competition hotting up, NDTV English had better pull up its socks and
choose quality anchors for prime time and, indeed, all viewing. It
simply cannot afford to rest on its oars. |
|
|