Saturday, June 3, 2006 |
|
THIS ABOVE ALL
Everyone
praises the truthful and runs down liars. But when it comes to the
nitty-gritty, we have to concede that liars get a better deal in life
than the truthful. It is ironic that even those who believe that
though truthfulness is next to godliness, it is largely the monopoly
of bholeybhaaleys, the simple-minded, who do not have the
brains to concoct lies — in short, they are buddhoos — stupid.
Most people do not trust the truthful because they speak their minds
openly and cause embarrassment. On the other hand, liars are regarded
as wordly-wise: they know duniyadaree — how to get on in the
world. They are sianas — wise: at the worst chalaak
(cunning). It is for all to see that in the rat race to success, the
honest and truthful are left behind, the clever and cunning forge
ahead and get to the winning post. No one pays much attention to the
saying that those who win the rat-race remain rats. I can cite many
examples of men and women of impeccable rectitude who fell by the
wayside while shrewd manipulators who compromised their integrity
managed to get what they wanted. I would love to name them to prove my
contention but know no newspaper would publish my list for fear of
being hauled up in court for libel. I quote words of wisdom in my
defence: Haq achhaa Haq key liye koee aur marey to aur achhaa; Tum
bhee koee Mansoor ho Jo soolee pey charho? Khaamosh raho (Truth
is good! If somebody else dies for it It is better. Are you
Mansoor, the martyr Who was on the gallows hung? Hold your tongue!)
The
Galbraiths I met the Galbraiths a few times when he was US
Ambassador in Delhi, I also had a fleeting glimpse of him in Boston
when he was back to teaching in Harvard. I recalled those meetings
when I read of his death at the age of 97. He was over six and a half
feet tall, slim and lanky and had a slight slouch when he walked. His
wife Catherine was unusually short for an American woman. They were an
unusual couple and went out of the way to befriend Indians. Among the
closest to them was Dr M.S. Randhawa who did a book on Indian art with
him and Rama Mehta who did another in collaboration with Catherine. I
am not sure whether he had read my two volumes on the History and
Religion of the Sikhs published by the Princeton University Press but
complimented me by describing it as "definitive". However,
when it came near Christmas one year and we were very short of Scotch,
we decided to call on the Galbraiths, give them a set of my books in
the hope they would reciprocate by presenting us in return a couple of
bottles of whisky or wine. I rang up his secretary for an appointment.
We were invited over a drink. We arrived with a parcel of my books. We
had a couple of drinks and got up to leave. At the door Galbraith said
suddenly, "We must give you something in return for your
Christmas gift" and shouted to his servant to get the parcel on
his table. Our hearts lifted. With a bow he presented it to my wife.
It contained some of his books. On another occasion, he told me of
his visit to a remote district of Bengal. The state government
provided him with a guide who knew the area well. He was a very
garrulous young man and a non-stop talker. While Galbraith wanted to
take in the scenery in silence, the young man went on and on yakking.
They were passing through a thick forest of eucalyptus trees. The
young escort was lecturing on their many varieties. To show some
interest Galbraith asked him: "Are they
indigenous?" "Oh yes sir, very indigenous," replied
the youngman. "We got them from Australia." In Boston when
I was staying with an old friend of my Lahore days, the Canadian Dr
Wilfred Cantwell-Smith, an eminent Islamic scholar and his wife
Muriel, I met him. They happened to be living next door to the
Galbraiths but their attempts to befriend them had been politely
ignored. I promised to break the ice between the neighbours. I was
invited over for tea. I took Wilfred along with me. Mrs Galbraith
served us tea and said her husband would be back soon. I was sitting
facing the entrance; Wilfred and Catherine with their backs to it. I
saw Galbraith come in, take a quick glance at us and tip-toe up the
stairs to his study. The telephone rang. Catherine took the call and
came back to tell us that her husband had been held up on urgent work,
and would not be able to join us. I blurted out, "but I saw him
come in and go upstairs." Catherine’s face went red with
embarrassment. Wilfreds went pale with anger. The snub was aimed at
the neighbour who Galbraith wanted to keep at a distance and not at me
who had come from a long distance. However, after that I had no desire
to see him. ENT conductor Santa: I want to meet the
conductor. Banta: This is a hospital, not a train or a band. We have
no conductor. Santa: I know that this is a hospital. I am having a
lot of pain in my kaan (ear) and so I want to meet the "kaan
doctor". (Contributed by Rajeshwari Singh, New
Delhi) |
|
|