Peacock in peril
Indians can no longer be proud as a peacock. The
national bird is being pushed to the brink of extinction. Poaching,
indiscriminate use of pesticides and lax laws to nab those who kill the
peacocks for their feathers, all add up to an endangered peacock
population, writes Aditi
Tandon.
THE
national bird of India is struggling for survival. The peacock
population is dwindling fast due to habitat loss, contamination of food
sources and poaching. Ironically, until today no census has been
conducted of the peacock. Non-feasibility has been cited as the only
reason. The sole stock-taking of the peacock population in India was
done by WWF India in 1991. It revealed that India was left with only 50
per cent of the total peacock population that existed at the time of
Partition in 1947. While the green peacock is already believed to be
extinct, the peacock may soon end up on the critically endangered list.
According to the Earth Island Journal, a journal that focuses on
the environment and wildlife,"Farmers use pesticides to battle
termites. After munching seeds treated with these insecticides, male
peacocks have been seen falling from trees, unable to fly."
In great demand for their feathers and flesh, peacocks are being
mercilessly hunted down all over from Rajasthan and peripheral Delhi to
Haryana and adjoining Punjab, once a rich peacock belt. Peacocks are
also targeted for their fat which, some mistake as a cure for arthritis.
Poaching is the most vital cause of the plummeting
peacock population across India , followed by environmental
contamination caused by sprinkling of heavy pesticides and insecticides
in the fields.
The most recent case of poaching surfaced in a Hoshiarpur forest in
Punjab on February 29 when two honorary wildlife wardens Gunraj Singh
and Sukhdeep Singh Bajwa caught SDM Pathankot with the "kill".
To the utter amazement of wildlife enthusiasts, the SDM managed bail in
an otherwise non-bailable offence, punishable with three years
imprisonment and Rs 10,000 fine. Further investigations conducted by the
Wildlife Institute, Dehra Dun which said the bird died due to gunshot
wounds, stood in sharp contrast to reports of the local Hoshiarpur
Veterinary Hospital, which said the birds died due to suffocation.
The report added that a detailed examination was not
possible because the birds were rotten. While the case is lingering,
with the honorary wildlife wardens under tremendous pressure to
compromise, it is to be seen if a conviction in an offence against the
national bird comes through, especially when the over-all conviction
rate under the Wildlife Protection Act is abysmally low.
In Punjab alone, only two poaching cases (one in
Ludhiana and the other in Ropar) reached the court in the past three
years. Wildlife Department officials confirm that in both the cases the
alleged culprits were let off after being sent to a 14-day judicial
remand, despite the fact that the peacock is protected under Section 51,
1-A of the Wildlife Protection Act and its killing is strictly
prohibited.
Of the few prosecutions in the peacock killing cases
in India, a landmark case, pursued till the prosecution stage in India
involved Lt Gen Baljit Singh (retd), the then Chief of Staff Central
Command at McCluskieganj near Ranchi, Bihar. Following the killing of
two peacocks in his area of command, Lt Gen Baljit Singh launched a
campaign to redeem the honour of the national bird. It was in this case
that the first-ever prosecution of the two suspected culprits happened.
Ever since, the rate of prosecution has been dipping, while conviction
is unheard of in cases registered under the Wildlife Protection Act.
With rates of conviction so low, fowlers and poachers
find it easy to stalk the birds and kill them for feathers. K.M. Thakur,
Regional Deputy Director, Wildlife Preservation, Northern Range, New
Delhi, when contacted, said though export, import and internal trade of
peacock had been banned under the Wildlife Protection Act. "Only
shed feathers are allowed to be used for the small scale industry. But
poaching of the peacock is rampant in Punjab, Haryana and around Delhi.
It is difficult to determine how many peacocks have been lost over the
years because a census of the bird has not been done till date. It is
not feasible. As of today, the peacock-rich belts are Haryana, adjoining
Punjab, Rajasthan, Delhi, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh."
Admitting to large-scale poaching, Delhi-based Brig
Ranjit Talwar from WWF India, reasoned, "Poaching of peacock is
done for white meat. While the young ones are mainly trapped for eating,
male peacocks are killed for feathers. Actually, the law permits
collection of moulted feathers, but once the feathers have been used in
artifacts it is difficult to say whether they were shed or pulled out.
Another problem in detecting violators is that most peacocks are killed
outside the protected areas. That is why 99 per cent poaching cases go
unreported."
A cause for concern is that most of the peacocks,
according to wildlife experts, are killed during the mating season. A
Punjab Wildlife Department official says, "It is the easiest to
kill a male peacock during the mating season when it dances around in
the open and can be easily targeted. You can well imagine how threatened
the peacock species would be when the male birds are being killed just
before mating. It is also easier to hunt peacocks down because they
sleep in the same trees every night. The procedure of killing is simple.
First the head is cut off, then the crest is ripped off and then the
tail feathers. There are fowlers who are even more cruel. If they don’t
want the feathers to be smeared with blood, they first trap the bird,
break its legs, pull out feathers and then kill it."
Peacock deaths have also been reported due to
deliberate spraying of pesticides in fields. Haryana and Punjab are
peculiar examples in this case. Punjab that once had a heavy peacock
concentration in Nabha-Patiala-Sangrur-Jalandhar belt now has few birds
left. Haryana’s case is the same. When mortality in peacocks was
reported in village Rampura in Mahendragarh on December 2, 1999, a
detailed examination was carried out by experts from Chaudhary Charan
Singh Hisar Agricultural University (CCHAU) in Haryana.
A team consisting of veterinary toxicologists,
pathologists and external specialist were rushed to the spot to carry
out investigations. The team reached in time to find one newly dead and
one sick bird. The experts concluded that the peacocks died of
chlorpyriphos toxicity. The mortality was among male peacocks only,
which were seen picking up wheat grains from the recently sown fields.
The concentration of Chlorpyriphos in the dead peacocks was found to be
(0.7575 ppm), three times higher than prescribed. This level of
concentration could not have been possible if the seeds were treated as
per the package of practices of the university.
Referring to the CCHAU study, R.D. Jakati, Chief
Wildlife Warden, Haryana says the peacocks are killed less due to
poaching and more due to environmental contamination. "Farmers
treat seeds with pesticide doses three times higher than recommended.
The HAU study revealed high concentration of pesticide chlorpyriphos in
the peacocks that died in Mahendragarh some time back. There are
intermittent reports on peacock mortality due to consumption of seeds
treated with pesticide 24 D, a weedicide."
To contain this dangerous trend, Haryana has launched awareness
generation programmes in villages. "District-level inspectors visit
three villages every month. They educate farmers on the need of using
the right quantity of pesticides. But farmers have problems of low
yield." Haryana wildlife officials have also written to the
Agriculture Department to work out options of animal and bird friendly
pesticides.
The National Bird
THE male
peacock (zoological name Pavo Cristatus) is a colourful,
swan-sized bird, with a fan-shaped crest of feathers, a white
patch under the eye and a long, slender neck. The male of the
species is more colourful than the female, with a glistening blue
breast and neck and a spectacular bronze-green train of around 200
elongated feathers.
The female is brownish, slightly smaller than the
male, and lacks the train. The elaborate courtship dance of the
male, fanning out the tail and preening its feathers, is a
gorgeous sight. The peacock is widely found in the Indian
subcontinent—to the south and east of the Indus river, in Jammu
and Kashmir, east Assam, south Mizoram and other places. Peacocks
are related to pheasants.
Though also domesticated in villages, they are found mostly in
jungles close to a waterfront. In Indian mythology, the peacock is
the vehicle of Lord Karthikeyan.
|
How the USA saved its emblem bird
IN the 1980s, the USA woke up with a start to find that the
bald-headed eagle, its emblem bird, had stopped hatching and
multiplying. Its egg shells had become fragile and were cracking
up in incubation. Many chemicals were also detected in the sources
of its food. Because it was a national bird, a country-wide
awareness campaign was launched through talk shows on TV and
articles in newspapers.
For a year, mass media devoted major space to
stories on the national bird and strategies for its revival. A
multidisciplinary approach was adopted to arrest the fall in the
bird’s population. Pesticides were banned, drives were launched
to bring the bird back into the procreation cycle, it was put on
the endangered list and highest penalties were fixed for harming
it. Researchers’ sole job was to single out every breeding pair,
mark its nest under surveillance and protect it from predators.
Once the eggs hatched, supply of unadulterated food was ensured.
The Americans even acted as foster parents to the birds, teaching
the fledglings to fly.
The USA harnessed all its modern technology to ensure that by
the turn of the century the bird had staged a comeback. Last year,
the population of the eagle stabilised and it was removed from the
endangered bird list.
But that was the story of a national bird in a country that cared
for it.
|
Legal cover for Indian wildlife
THE
peacock is protected under Schedule I of the
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Section 9 of the Act prohibits
hunting of wild animals and birds specified in Schedule I, II, and
III and IV, except as provided under Sections XI and XII. This
classification has been made keeping in mind the significance and
population of wildlife. Those highly threatened find a place in
Schedule I. Section 51 of the Act prescribes a maximum
imprisonment of six years, Rs 25,000 fine or both for hunting
animals and birds specified on Schedule I. In case of partridges
(also killed in the recent case in Hoshiarpur, Punjab), mentioned
in Schedule II, Section 51 provides for a maximum imprisonment of
three years, Rs 25,000 fine or both. In case of Haryana, where the
partridge is a state bird, its hunting is a non-bailable offence.
Even though the punitive measures under law are exhaustive, the
enforcement is very poor. Wildlife Department officials admit that
out of 100 killings of a peacock, just one is reported. Although a
case is sometimes registered under the Wildlife Protection Act, it
never reaches court because of several inducements for key
witnesses of poaching. Even if the case reaches court, the lack of
awareness about Wildlife Act provisions invariably results in
miscarriage of justice. That is why one hardly hears of
convictions under the Wildlife Protection Act.
India set a precedent by formulating The Wild Birds Protection
Act of 1887, the first law for the protection of wildlife wealth.
Later, India had the Wild Bird and Animals Protection Act in 1912,
prohibiting capture, killing, selling, buying or possession of
specified animals or birds. With future amendments, wildlife
sanctuaries were set up to promote wildlife conservation. The
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, became a watershed because it
addressed various aspects of the issue. In 1986, trade or commerce
in trophies and animal articles was prohibited. The 1991, an
amendment made punishments more stringent. It also banned trade in
imported ivory and products and transportation of wildlife or
products without permission.
|
|