Saturday,
October 11, 2003 |
|
FOR
years the Indian electronic media has been dependent on foreign sources
for foreign news. And for regular Indian news or news concerning India
from abroad we get very cursory coverage but for the honourable
exception of two stalwarts, Saeed Naqvi and Prannoy Roy. Naqvi has
anchored the longest running programme of its kind on Doordarshan and
Prannoy Roy’s The World This Week also originated on DD but
closed down when he left the channel. For the rest, DD’s coverage was
and remains pathetic. AIR correspondents with no training in television
double as TV correspondents. And this work too is monopolised by print
journalists mostly from the Press Information Bureau and allied
government offices with no connection with TV. When Bhaskar Ghosh was DG
of Doordarshan and later secretary to the ministry, he saw the injustice
that was being done to DD’s news correspondents, some who like Rudra
Sanyal were specialised in fields like defence. He also recruited and
trained younger people. But soon it was back to square one. The pathetic
standard of reporting was revealed during the PM’s visit to Turkey and
the UN, when DD’s correspondent came across with poor technical
quality and a thick accent which made it impossible even for a seasoned
watcher to make out what he was saying. Besides, AIR and DD
correspondents accompanying VVIPs abroad get official lodging as well as
priority in interviews. Private channels and the press come after the
government media in the ranking list. With the government rushing to
install a pliable news channel for the forthcoming elections at the
expense of its successful Metro entertainment channel, the same old
mistakes are being made all over again. And the sufferers will be DD’s
professional news staff who will lose out again to outsiders with
political clout and, of course, the viewer for whom Prasar Bharati cares
two hoots as long as the political bosses are happy. As for the
independent channels, their correspondents either accompany the PM and
other VVIPs on a short-term basis for their trips abroad or send
correspondents on equally short trips when some event takes place
abroad. But the regular Indian media correspondent abroad is still hard
to come by and not in the same class as some Indian newspaper
correspondents. |
It was Puja-Dasehra time and for those of us who could not make it to Ramlila Grounds, Chittranjan Park and their equivalents all over the country, it was a joy to sit in front of the TV set and watch everything in comfort. Every channel tried to outdo the other while some preferred to keep things within bounds on some very politically newsy days. But for covering the Dasehra fireworks at Ramlila Grounds, I give the top prize to Zee News, which doggedly covered it from start to finish and their largely boring commentary was wiped out by some first-rate camerawork and sound by its technical crew which showed a high degree of news sense, catching the delighted children in the crowd and other interesting details rather than focusing unduly on VIPs. Typically, when the news was broken about the murderous attack on the Andhra CM and his colleagues, the inexperienced anchors and newscasters mostly at the Aaj Tak studio behaved in the same irresponsible and mindless way that they did with the Bombay blasts. They asked impossible, mindless and ignorant questions and, worse still, wasted the precious time of busy officials on duty such as the chief of police or local administrators. Some of the inane questions asked within minutes of the event were: who did it, what was used, when do you hope to catch the culprits, how serious are the injuries. Some irresponsible interviewers think the longer they detain the police and others on duty by asking the same stupid questions, the better their "exclusives". I think the officials are far too patient and polite and in future should say firmly, "Sorry I have to rush to work now," even if some persistent correspondent might be too thick-skinned or ignorant to take the hint. |