|
Artist as painter of zodiac signs Veer Munshi in his artistic take-off on the zodiac signs makes and breaks icons and popular beliefs, writes
Nirupama Dutt
WHAT is common between Lord Shiva, Shakespeare, Satyajit Ray and Sachin Tendulkar? A funny question indeed. Ask Veer Munshi, our Chitranjan Park neighbourhood painter in New Delhi, and he will run his hand over his receding hairline and say in all wisdom: "They are Taurians pushing and bold; As it has been told." Munshi’s recent body of work finds him unravelling the world of the zodiac signs with painterly aplomb and, in the process, painting images that please the eye and stimulate the mind. The abstract world of the
Zodiac signs, indeed, makes for a fantastic study and also one of the
most popular ones. The success of the fortune columns in newspapers is
such, perhaps the best-read column after the weather report, that many
papers now carry it every day instead of just the weekend. Thus, the
Zodiac signs become for this artist a metaphor through which he
communicates the mood of our times by making and breaking icons. And his
achievement is that he transcends mere classification to put a question
mark on the generalisations the Zodiac signs make. Munshi’s
interpretation of the characteristics of a sign is often a strong
commentary on the human journey. |
The image of the Ram is pasted like a postage stamp on forehead of the self-portrait. A compelling work indeed! What is very interesting is that the works of famous artists, perhaps those who always fascinated Munshi, and their lives are interwoven in these paintings. We have Salvador Dali as the thrusting bull for Taurus, leading as though the rogue gallery of others born under this sign. Other artists who figure in these series are Paul Gauguin, Pablo Picasso, M.F. Husain, Bhupen Khakhar and Munshi himself. Born at Srinagar, Kashmir and schooled in art at the M.S. University, Baroda, Munshi has been sensitive to the politics of violence and displacement. His installations and art works exhibited in group shows have shown him commenting strongly on the politics of the time. The artist says of these works, "Many of them have been like slogans made for shows specially designed to protest against events." However, in these works it is the emergence of metaphor that encases his philosophy. These paintings work at many levels — enjoy the visual delight of iconography if you will; lose yourself in the mystery of the sun signs or look beyond and see what the artist says between the strokes as it were. Very interesting indeed is the depiction of the Aquarius mystery. Aquarius is the sign of the New Age — the evolving sign that feels it must return to life what it has gathered from it down the centuries. Thus the painting has images of the Charles Darwin Theory of Evolution along with a pitcher of the Good Earth for the Aquarian is the water-bearer. What is returned to the Earth is, however, violence in the image of a terrorist. It is here that the artist is brilliant in envisaging, what could be and what is. Politicians too figure in these series most interestingly. To represent the Capriconian we have none other than Atal Bihari Vajpayee with the head replaced by the lotus flower and the many arms holding symbols of different faiths but the trident somewhat more prominent than the others. The Leo prowess is featured by Bill Clinton and Mandela for talking of Cancer, the artist says: ‘A Mandela is always on the round somewhere...’ Munshi made these twelve large and complex canvases over a period of two to three years. However, the research and study took up a much longer time. "I read so much about the Zodiac philosophy. Not just that in delineating personality types. I started reading about Van Gogh. Then I read his letters to his brother Theo. So I gathered a lot of knowledge in the process." It is the artist’s accomplishment that nowhere does he brother the viewer with all the acquired knowledge but invites him to embark on this fascinating journey using symbols in economy. The result is aesthetically very pleasing. A challenge, indeed, but then what would art be if there were no challenges ahead? |