Hermann Goering’s remarks in the Nuremberg Diary about what
prompted the British to enter the World War II, "They
entered the war to prevent us from going into the East, not to
have the East come to the Atlantic", are echoed by Sebald.
He graphically depicts how the British strategy of area bombing
brought wretchedness to civilians in 131 cities. The RAF dropped
a million tons of bombs, flattening three and half million
homes, rendering seven and half million homeless and killing
600,000 civilians. This and other cold figures fail to tell the
gruesome story of firestorms charring living humans, of bodies
rotting under mounds of rubble, and of rats feeding on human
flesh. He recounts several eyewitness accounts. On July 27,
1943, for example, ten thousand tons of high explosives and
incendiary bombs were dropped on densely populated residential
areas east of Elbe. In his words, "A now familiar sequence
of events occurred`85Within a few minutes, huge fires were
burning all over the target area`85the whole airspace was a sea
of flames as far as the eye could see`85a firestorm of an
intensity that no one would ever before have thought possible
arose`85two thousand meters into the sky`85burned for three
hours." The consequent storm lifted "gables and roofs
from buildings`85and drove human beings before it like human
torches." Many lost their sanity before dying a terrible
death in the melted asphalt as the flames "rolled like a
tidal wave through the streets" at a speed of over 150
km/h.
Why have German
writers — past and present — not detailed these aspects of
the war? Has it something to do with the sense of collective
guilt shared by an entire nation for the doings of Hitler and
his henchmen? Or did they believe the destruction was a
"poetic justice", a "just punishment"? Those
German intellectuals who had stayed back "refrained
entirely from commenting on the process and outcome of
destruction, probably not least for fear that accurate
descriptions might get them into trouble with the occupying
forces." A process was set into motion that reconstructed
Germany in a manner which amounted to a "second
liquidation" of the nation’s history, "pointing the
population exclusively towards the future and enjoining on it
silence about the past." Thus the "literature of
ruins" became a victim of collective amnesia. Whatever was
published — obscurely symbolic and pseudo-aesthetic — was
too little and too late.
And what about the
common folk? Did they too "look away" from the
destruction surrounding them? The havoc generated a psychic
energy among the people that helped their fatherland reclaim its
top-of-the-heap status among the comity of nations. These were
the people who tried to sustain a modicum of normalcy amidst
raging fires by listening to music on radio and even attending
or organising operas and symphonies. They went about their
normal chores to the best of their ability. There is the story
of a woman cleaning the windows of a house — the only one left
intact after the bombings. And of another woman who swept the
remains of her people killed in air raids into a boiler in order
to reach her place of work in time. People cooked food in the
open amidst ruins and cadavers, or had evening tea in a
seemingly leisurely manner.
Were these people
being heroic or plain insensitive to their dead and maimed
compatriots? The answer depends upon what dimension of the truth
one beholds. But these are the people who have risen from the
ashes, despite propaganda of all sorts.
The ethical issues
raised by Sebald remain unresolved to this day. The Vietnam and
Cambodian bloodbaths should never have happened if morality had
anything to do with international power politics. Civilian
dwellings were bombed out of existence in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The truth of consequent human misery will come out in phases.
|