|
"The landlord had put 1 and 2 in room
A, 3 in room B, 4 in room C, 5 in room D, 6 in room E, 7 in room F, 8 in
room G and 9 in room H. In room I, he had not put the 10th man, but he
had put the second man in room I," says Harinder Singh of
Panchkula.
"I was much amused to
read the problem and a bit puzzled, too, at first, but then a quote
attibuted to Paul Dirac (1902-1984) came to my mind: In science, one
tries to tell people, in such a way as to be understood by everyone,
something that no one ever knew before, but in poetry, it’s the exact
opposite. So, it was just a trick of words, as there was no tenth man in
Room A, so, he did nothing with the people in Room A and placed the
actual tenth in Room I; and two men shared Room A. The other dreadful
possibility that came to my mind after reading the other poem is that
the host might have eaten or done to death the actual 10th person,"
says Dr Tarsem Lal of Khanna.
"He locked the tenth
in the safe in room I, since safe is a kind of room," says Ashok
Sharma. Many other explanations were far more amusing, but those were
also far more unprintable.
Ten Travellers’ appeared
as an untitled poem in Current Literature in the April of 1889.
No author was credited. This ninth stanza exposing the fallacy is
attributed to John F. Mooney:
If we reflect on what he’s
done,
We’ll see were not
insane.
Two men in A he’s
counted one,
Not once but once again.
Amarjit Kaur will prove to
be a better host anytime because she doesn’t change her mind like Dr
Tarsem. The Walrus and the Carpenter was given to distract all.
(Write at The Tribune or adityarishi99@yahoo.co.in‘
|