The second section dwells on various perceptions (commodity,
commons, basic rights and divinity), perspectives (riparian,
federalist, legal, civil society, human rights, economic) and
laws on water and water rights. Advocating a multi-faceted
perspective, the author feels that each viewpoint embodies
important principles and values and hence a hierarchy or
centrality to anyone will defeat the purpose.
A chapter on
groundwater legislation brings forth various pros and cons of
existing legal positions vis-`E0-vis groundwater and some
recommendations in this regard.
The third section
takes up the most controversial and vexatious topic of large
dams. Arguments put forth transcend the conventional
pro/anti-dam rhetoric, suggesting a middle path, which is
"a combination or integration of a large project with
smaller projects and/or with watershed development programme in
holistic manner for an entire area."
Iyer does not
dismiss the raison de etre of large projects, keeping in
view the development required by a country with such a vast
population. But his submission is that large projects should
always be treated as ‘option of the last resort,’ given the
enormity of the cost involved in ecological, social and cultural
terms.
A critique of the
Supreme Court’s judgement on the Narmada Bachao Andolan’s
writ petition on the Sardar Sarovar project also finds place.
A discussion on the dysfunctional and discordant nature of
relationship that developed between the Government of India and
the World Commission on Dams points towards the extent to which
the powerful lobby of dam builders can go in order to damage the
credibility of people and institutions associated with
alternative models of development.
The fourth section
discusses scarcities and conflicts relating to water resources
in the language of security. The good news is that Iyer dismiss
the ‘war for water’ thesis as unfounded and implausible.
Instead, he submits that the crisis facing humanity is global
and not regional. The essential conflict is between the affluent
countries and the rest of the world. He cautions against being
caught in the local/regional security debate and losing the
focus in identifying the real enemy. The fifth section includes
a chapter on conflict resolution as illustrated by various river
water treaties that India has with its neighbours and a brief
discussion on the question of perceived shortage of water in the
Ganges and the fallacy of the idea of ‘augmenting’ the flows
of the river.
The final section
is based on a comprehensive diagnosis of the present state of
affairs, while the problems and failures of the past provide a
critical review of some of the recent studies on future water
requirements. The bottom-line argument is in favour of
localised, environment-friendly and people-oriented water
resource building measures like water harvesting. Dismissing the
idea of linking rivers as mirage, the author asserts that
instead of being hypnotised by such grandiose schemes we need to
explore the possibilities of local augmentation.
In short, this
book is a wonderfully rich addition to the ‘small is beautiful’
thesis on development and a powerful counterpoint to hegemonic
‘big is the best’ mindset.
|