The Tribune - Spectrum

ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday, July 6, 2003
Books

Off the shelf
History on Red Fort walls
V.N. Datta

 Red Fort THE Mughal Empire had great passion for building palaces, forts and gardens. Shah Jahan was the wealthiest of the Mughal rulers who built whatever he could on a grand scale. Constructing such buildings may denote self-expression, a gratification of enormous personal vanity, and a disposition to bequeath a legacy to posterity as a token of adulation and administration. As a dire necessity, Akbar had to build the town of Fatehpur Sikri as his headquarters. Jahangir moved up and down Agra, Delhi, Lahore and Kashmir. Shah Jahan built his capital known as Shahjahnabad, mainly due to scarcity of water in Fatehpur Sikri.

A spate of historical literature has appeared on Delhi and its architecture, including the standard works produced and published by James Fergusson, Percy Brown and Stephen Carr. The author of the book under review, Anisha Shekhar Mukherji, too, follows the set tradition of examining Mughal architecture in her work entitled Red Fort of Shahjahanabad (Oxford University Press, New Delhi. Pages VIII+272).

This work claims to be "an architectural biography of the evolving palace and city," throwing light on how life was lived within the Red Fort and its environs. The book opens with a short review of the historiography on the Red Fort highlighting the different perspectives provided by previous writers in their assessment. As a guide, the author takes us into the interior of the fort to see the buildings sequentially. Here is Chatta Chowk and there the Naqqar Khanna, where the musicians performed. Further on is the Diwan-i-Am (hall of public audience) followed by Diwan-i-Khas (private audience hall) through which flowed the Nihr-i-Bahesht. Then follow other buildings, the imperial kitchens, Rang Mahal, Mussaman Burj, the five-floored British barracks, Moti Masjid, the imperial Hammams, Asad Burj, Pearl Palace and Zafar Palace, etc.

 


Many of these handsome and costly structures which have defied the stormy times continue to exist in their timeless spirit echoing not inharmoniously the times when Delhi was really Delhi, evoking the memory of the past tinged with sorrow.

A recital or enumeration of the buildings, however beautiful, is not a satisfying experience. The author rightly resurrects and reconstructs the past of the Red Fort, its design and structure, its development and transformation. Because of the historic role the fort has played, naturally its history submerges into the history of Delhi and India.

Mukherji does not study the Red Fort in isolation but links it up with the history of Delhi and the country. Being a strategic and administrative place of great importance and carrying with it memories of the past, Delhi’s importance in the history of India is unquestioned.

By examining closely the existing buildings in the Red Fort in the light of enormous historical literature, Mukherji has tried to build up her story. To recover the pristine glory and splendour of this fort is difficult because a great deal of it was pillaged, ransacked and destroyed in the 18th and 19th centuries by Nadir Shah, Ahamad Shah Abdali, the Marathas and the Jats. The British too converted it into a cantonment in 1857. By a comparative evaluation of the Red Fort and other buildings erected in the ancient and medieval periods, Mukherji emphasises that the Red Fort, by assimilating various elements of Hindu and Muslim architecture, represents the finest values of India’s "composite culture," bearing the "stamp of eclectic tastes" untrammelled by any sectarianism and narrow-mindedness.

The author maintains that the site of the Red Fort was determined by astrologers, which is interesting. But one wonders whether Shah Jahan’s consultation with the astrologers is a speculation, hearsay or reality in the absence of any evidence in support of such a contention. The Red Fort was inaugurated in the 21st year of Shah Jahan’s reign, and its master builders were Ustad Hamid and Ustad Ahmed assisted by talented and experienced Hindu masons. Hindu planning lay behind the fort.

Professor M. Mujeeb thought it absolutely inappropriate to associate anything of the military with the Red Fort as more than half of its area is occupied by gardens, added to which are the public and private quarters that are vulnerable to infiltration from outside. He was disappointed with Diwan-i-Am, which he regarded as pompous and garish.

To the author, the Diwan-I-Khas is "an example of the purest form of the pavilion typology," and the "vaulted Chatta Bazar, the noblest entrance known to belong to any existing palace," and further, Shah Jahan’s Palace "the most magnificent in the East."

Mukherji shows how Aurangzeb’s stern puritanism destroyed the cultural life within the fort, and the glory of the fort was gone by the end of the 18th century due to the invasions of Nadir Shah, Ahamed Shah Abdali and the civil wars raging in the streets of Delhi. There sat on the Mughal throne a mock ruler, Bahadur Shah, a British pensioner who was banished, and the British converted the Red Fort into a cantonment.

Towards the end of the book, Mukherji offers some constructive suggestions for the restoration of the former glory of the fort, which are worth consideration.

In this work it may be worth combining the introductory chapter with the other chapter entitled ‘The City Within’ to avoid repetition. This scholarly work based on extensive primary sources and intensive fieldwork could go as standard work on the Red Fort.