Monday,
June 30, 2003 |
|
Feature |
|
Cellphone in pouch,
confidence in heart
Malvika Kaul
A
woman vegetable vendor recently used a cellphone and called Indian
President A P J Abdul Kalam on his mobile. The President was only a few
feet away from her and the cellphone she used was borrowed.
But it was a special day
for her and thousands like her: the launch of the Thaili (pouch) Phone
Programme of Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA).
SEWA members - vegetable
vendors, tobacco workers, gum collectors and village artisans - will now
keep their cellphones in these beautifully handcrafted cloth pouches
hanging from the wrist or tucked into their sari-clad waist.
For the vegetable vendor,
this was the first brush not only with the country’s President, but
also with technology. At SEWA’s headquarters in Ahmedabad, President
Kalam also inaugurated the Computer Learning Centre called Vignan SEWA.
The programme aims to train over 12,000 women in the next three years in
ICT (Information Communication Technology). Already, several slum and
village women in Gujarat are learning to communicate through satellite
conferences and video filming.
Computers, cellphones,
teleconferences via satellite stations? Do women who barely manage to
get two square meals need information technology? Can illiterate women
even use technology? Jebunissa, a Muslim farmer in Gujarat’s Rawanpura
village, sells her exquisitely embroidered pieces through SEWA. She
says: "Two years ago when I saw a computer for the first time, it
was magic. I saw how you could make designs and save them on the
computer and send them for approval on e-mail. The computer is like a
window to the world. I told my husband I would learn how to use a
computer."
While
liberalisation and globalisation have fetched huge profits for some,
women who earn 25 per cent of the national income have been kept out of
the long chain of global markets. The Indian embroidered dress at the
New York store, which sells for $100, only pays Rs 10 to the woman
artisan for her craft. Globalisation has only increased women workers’
vulnerabilities in an already exploitative market. — WFS
|