Monday,
June 16, 2003 |
|
Feature |
|
55 per cent of e-mail
is spam
Paul Harris
HUNCHED
over his computer keyboard in a London suburb, Steve Linford is fighting
a desperate war. The numbers ranged against him are growing and he fears
he may be losing.
Linford is one of the
world’s foremost fighters of spam — random e-mails that plague all
our inboxes. For persons like him such ‘junk’ mail is not just a
nuisance, it is a menace that could bring the e-mail system to a halt.
He thinks we may have only six months left. ‘The e-mail system is on
the edge of meltdown,’ he said.
Internet service
providers are becoming jammed. Linford believes the network will soon
begin to slow down, then many e-mails will get lost, followed by the
entire global system crashing. Spam will have destroyed the most
revolutionary communications system since the telephone.
Figures from e-mail
security firm MessageLabs show that last month for the first time spam
accounted for more than half of all e-mails sent, at 55.1 per cent, a
third up on the month before.
Linford runs Spamhaus,
a project dedicated to fighting spam and tracking down those who send
it. From a narrowboat on the Thames, he helps coordinate 10 volunteers
around the world who maintain a ‘spam watch’ 24 hours a day.
Hackers from Spamhaus
have infiltrated secure Internet chatrooms where they pose as spammers
to glean information on new targets or techniques. They can identify
where spammers are sending from and try to block them with specially
written programs. They are also collecting information on individual ‘spam
lords’ and maintain a database of personal details of almost 200 of
the world’s spammers.
Spamming is big
business, and vicious too. Linford gets regular death threats and no
longer opens post sent by persons he does not recognise.
It is thought that as
few as 150 spammers are responsible for 90 per cent of junk mail. One of
the most prolific is Alan Ralsky, who is rare among spammers in having a
public media profile. He has just fitted out his home in Michigan in the
USA with servers capable of sending a billion messages a day. Victims
got their own back when Ralsky’s address was posted on the Internet by
anti-spammers. They registered his house for thousands of catalogues,
leaflets and other junk mail and soon Ralsky faced a deluge of post each
day.
Even if just one person
in a million responds, that is enough to make spamming profitable. The
key weapon in the spammer’s armoury is the ability to collect enormous
databases of e-mail addresses that are ‘harvested’ from the
Internet. Complex computer programs roam the Web collecting e-mail
addresses from
home pages. Other programs send randomly addressed e-mails by the
million. Every genuine
address discovered is then logged and sold on.
CDs containing millions of e-mail addresses are then sold between
spammers for a few dollars.
The legal landscape in
which spam operates is confusing. In some countries strict laws make
spamming illegal while others have given it free rein. Even in the USA
it varies from state to state. In some states forging the headers of
e-mails is illegal, making it possible to prosecute spammers. In others
it is not.— GNS
|