The authors hold the 1989 elections as watershed one, which
marked the beginning of a "new electoral pattern"
characterised by the federalisation of the party system, with
regional parties gaining in terms of political influence at the
federal level. The authors also note an increasing level of
adherence to the politics of pluralism and consensus as
evidenced from "an intricate network of regional
alliances".
The authors argue
that the above shift underlines the need for a rethinking on the
constitutional provisions relating to the nature and functions
of constitutional offices, inter-governmental agencies, as well
as the federal structure. That explains why the authors, besides
mentioning the new trend of judicial activism, also take up the
issue of reforms relating to electoral and party politics in
India.
The emerging
electoral politics is also witness to a gradual degeneration of
political parties and electoral processes. Such degeneration
manifests itself through the increasing role of organised crime,
increased corruption and the holding of big businesses by a new
breed of politicians who act as vote contractors. In this
context the authors have extensively referred to the
recommendations of the two parliamentary committees headed by
Dinesh Goswamy and Inderjit Gupta, as well as the Law Commission
in 1999 and the Election Commission in 1998.
Concerned with
making the electoral system function more efficiently, cleanly
and equitably, the authors advocate the need for a level playing
field and for curbing the misuse of money and muscle power. The
authors also insist on the need for reforms in the rules that
govern the regulation of the nature of representation. They also
seek to curb the proliferation of parties through various
methods such as more stringent recognition criteria and
disincentives for smaller parties. Such a view tends to ignore
the close link between electoral and party politics and the
social realities that these reflect. In their attempt to make
the electoral process more manageable, the authors also do not
give due consideration to size and diversity of the Indian
electorate.
|