The Romani history is an epitome of suffering. Nazis killed
about six million Jews. It is not widely known that in the very
gas chambers from five to 15 lakh Romanis perished. The exact
figure of death would never be known. There was no Romani
representation in the Nuremburg Trials of the Nazis. Germany has
paid reparations to the Jewish survivors, but not to the Romanis
to date. For anyone to have a Jewish grandparent condemned the
person to the gas chamber. In the case of Romanis the line of
extinction extended to the great grandparents. Had the Jewish
standard of death been applied to the Romanis, about 20,000 of
them would have been spared.
Like the Sikhs,
the Romanis are an international community. About a quarter to
one-third of them live outside their main stronghold in Eastern
Europe. From about 16 million Sikhs, a million live outside
Punjab. Both are vexed with the question of identity. In recent
years Romanis have produced their own intelligentsia. Rejecting
both assimilation and separation they are seized with a more
creative response of how to keep one’s identity in an alien
power structure—a question immediately pertinent for one
million Sikhs abroad.
Paradoxically, the
backward Romanis can be an inspiration to the most advanced
secularists. The Romanis have no church, no priests, no
scripture, no redemption to bother. Yet they believe in ji
(a Punjabi word, Sanskrit jiv), meaning spiritual
strength.
Romani scholarship
has made immense progress in historical methodology. Lexico-statistical
analysis of Romani language has mapped out Romani route from
India to Europe. The genome study has established that the
Slovak Romanis are nearest to the Punjabis and Rajasthanis.
A language has a
grammar. Romani is unique in having two grammars, one for words
of Indian origin and one for words from European languages.
Abstract nouns are made by suffixing pan (Punjabi/Hindi)
and mos (Greek).
The Romani
intelligentsia are working on the idea of non-territorial
nation. It was vaguely there in pre-modern political thought.
But its exposition in the present day world would be a landmark
of thought.
|