Monday, May 5, 2003 |
|
Feature |
|
Spicing up the server
scenario
Roopinder Singh
Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft, announces the general availability of Windows Server 2003, in San Francisco. Ballmer is standing next to an HP server that will utilise Server 2003.
— Reuters |
Servers
that serve computers are actually more powerful than the computers that
they serve, an interesting paradox. When we talk about a server, we are
referring to a powerful computer connected over a network to a large
number of computers. It shares data and/or applications with them.
Servers in office environments have practically been monopolised by the
Windows operating system (OS). However, Windows has not been able to
find a foothold in the high-end server market, which is dominated by
UNIX. Such computers run on RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer)
processors as opposed to the Intel versions that power most Windows
machines.
Obviously, Microsoft wants
to change the situation and in its most serious effort so far, it
launched Windows Server 2003 last fortnight, with which it wants to make
inroads into the high-end server market. This has been made easier with
the usual help from Intel, this time in the form of Itanium 2 processor.
With the release of the operating system came a demonstration of a $6.4
million HP Superdome server that has 64 Itanium processors.
Grandson of NT 4
Of course, system
administrators will have to look beyond the hype and assess their needs,
but this is billed as a "comprehensive, integrated and secure
infrastructure designed to help customers reduce costs and increase the
efficiency and effectiveness of IT operations," and is an extension
of the Windows 2000 family. It is expected to be robust and secure,
which accounts for its name and release dates being changed four times.
It was originally scheduled to be released in 2001. Millions of
computers run the Windows NT 4 OS, which may be said to be the
grandfather of the new baby, and it is expected that many will want to
upgrade to Windows Server 2003.
Log in...Tribune asked
Rajiv Kaul, MD, Microsoft India, about the marketing strategies being
adopted for the latest OS. Yasir Yousuff, Senior Marketing Manager,
Microsoft India, responded to the product-related queries. The following
are excerpts from their responses:
Is the Windows Server 2003
as reliable as its competition? What are the main changes that have been
made in the server to make it better?
Windows Server 2003
includes new features and improvements that make it the most reliable,
enterprise-ready server OS that Microsoft has created to date.
IT professionals know that
device drivers are the leading cause of unplanned downtime, so we’ve
made a number of changes in how Windows Server 2003 handles device
driver checking and support, including blocking drivers that are known
to hang on a majority of systems. Other innovations include enabling
applications to run in process isolation, COM+ and IIS 6.0 application
recycling, memory mirroring for fault tolerance, new clustering
capabilities, and side-by-side DLL installs.
How can one trust the
trustworthy initiative, especially since there have been numerous
reports of security breaches in Windows machines?
The trustworthy computing
initiative is an investment that will demonstrate returns in the long
term. With Windows Server 2003, we have made significant strides in
making our product more secure for all audiences. Microsoft spent nearly
$200 million in training 13,000 Windows developers on new
security-focused development techniques, implementing new engineering
processes, and completing a security review of Windows Server 2003.
Secure by design and
default
Besides fixing bugs,
developers also found a number of other ways to tighten security by
design in Windows Server 2003. For example, the team removed the
Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) feature from Windows Server 2003 because
you need UPnP on your desktop or home PC to find other devices, but it’s
not something you need on a server.
In the past, product
features were typically enabled by default. Today, Microsoft has turned
that policy around and is much more likely to choose the most secure
option as the default setting. With Windows Server 2003, Microsoft
disabled or reduced the privileges of more than 20 different services by
default, including Internet Information Services 6.0.
Secure by deployment
One of the things we found
in working with customers and other industry security experts is that 95
per cent of all security problems were caused by misconfiguration.
Microsoft has built a
knowledge base of best practices related to how servers should be
deployed according to role, and created a wizard that asks the person
deploying the server a few simple questions about their environment. The
wizard then configures the server for the optimal secure state.
What is the Microsoft game
plan for this high-end sector?
The launch of Windows
Server 2003, SQL Server 2000 64 bit, Visual Studio .NET is the
cornerstone of Microsoft’s enterprise strategy of delivering unmatched
business value, enabling customers to achieve greater efficiencies at
lower costs. With this new range we will consolidate our position in the
enterprise space and grow our existing market share.
Microsoft will work
closely with its hardware and ISV partners to ensure customer support.
If I were a systems
administrator, why would I consider Windows Server 2003?
IT administrators are
challenged to build secure and manageable infrastructures, while
reducing downtime and operational costs. Windows Server 2003 has been
designed to support the demands of today’s businesses by delivering
consistently high levels of reliability, scalability and manageability
while consistently delivering breakthroughs in cost reduction and
accelerated return on investment.
|