The Tribune - Spectrum

ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday, April 20, 2003
Books

Tracing history of the SBI
B. S. Thaur

The Evolution of the State Bank of India.
Sage Publications. Pages 674. Rs 1,100.

The Evolution of the State Bank of IndiaTHIS book is the third volume of history of the State Bank of India. It covers the Imperial Bank era which lasted from 1921-1955. Two volumes, covering the period form 1876-1920, on Presidency Banks were published in the eighties. Incidentally, the Imperial Bank era was a crucial phase in Indian history. It was marked by nationalist upsurge, great market depression, separation of Burma, formation of the Reserve Bank of India, evolution of banking, World War II, Independence, Partition and above all, a free nation with high expectations from the banking system. All these events have been suitably taken up in the book.

The State Bank's history can be traced to banks of Bengal, Bombay and Madras called the Presidency Banks, which were primarily created by the British to serve the European Commerce. The amalgamation of these banks for the formation of the Imperial Bank took place in 1921. Ultimately, nationalisation of the Imperial Bank rechristened it as the State Bank of India in 1955. The author states the nationalisation of the bank has a long story. The demand for this was first echoed in 1948 in the Constituent Assembly. The members called the bank a bete noire that deserved no mercy. An interesting passage from the autobiography of C.D. Deshmukh, a former Governor of the RBI, as quoted is as thus:

"As Governor of the RBI, I had opposed earlier suggestions to nationalise the Imperial Bank on the ground that against the economic environment as it then was, such a measure was premature. In making my views felt I had drawn support from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. Early during my tenure as Finance Minister I had treated with scant regard similar suggestion from my colleague T.T. Krishnamchari". Yet it was the same man who four years later made the historical announcement of nationalisation of the Imperial Bank.

 


Notably, the demand for lending to the agricultural sector by banks is not of recent origin. Rather some 70 years back, Sardar Buta Singh from Punjab had taken up this issue in the Council of States in 1933 to empower the Imperial Bank for lending to agriculture estates.

The precarious position of Imperial Bank's branches in West Pakistan during Partition when all their Hindu staff had migrated to India and the Muslim staff was not immediately available and how the situation was dealt with is an interesting study piece for bankers.

Though the author is at his narrative best in giving the brief account of Indian politics till the mid 1930, it looks alien to the main account of history of a bank to go in for purely political events which form a good portion of the book.

In a chapter, aftermath of Partition, legacy of the Raj, devaluation of rupee, free India's endeavour to boost exports from the country, the Banking Companies Act, 1949, have been discussed. The Act assumes significance because as many as 647 banks had failed between 1939 and 1949.

Though the book can be useful to the students of economics and history, the team of authors, who appear to be on the staff of the bank, obviously forgot Johan Betjeman who said, "History must not be written with bias and both sides must be given even if there is only one side."