There was no success as far as sale and recognition go, for your
first three books, but now your books create a sensation of
sort. How do you think this has come about? Have the publishers
changed their attitude towards you or have you done something to
effect this change?
Well, yes, now
they create a minor sensation. But my writing has not changed.
The style of writing may have changed. It changes with every
book. I guess now readers and publishers are opening up a lot
more towards me.
One critic
describes you as a long-distance runner, persevering against all
odds. How did you deal with the initial discouragement?
By the way, I
really used to do some long-distance running. Yes, as a writer
one has to persevere. As for me, I just went from one novel to
the next. When you are already immersed in the next book, you
don’t reflect back to think of the failure.
After winning the
Crossword Award for The Everest Hotel, you said you would
have written parts of it differently and some characters could
have been developed better. Would you say the same thing about
the Brainfever Bird some day?
I already feel
that way about the Brainfever Bird. I was reading from
the prologue at the book launch (on February 28) and realised it
could have been organised differently. Prologue is a kind of
introduction to the puppet play in the novel. It’s very
important for any introduction that you get the audience
interested in the spectacle of the play. You have to get the
audience on your side. I was, in a sense, performing for the
first time as a script and that performance told me that I
should have made the changes.
Are you a
perfectionist?
Yes, I am. The
perspective changes with time and looking back you tend to feel
you could have done much better.
Your previous
book, The Everest Hotel was set in the hills and this one
is based in two bustling metropolitan cities. Did you choose
these cities because you happened to live in these or did you
stay in these cities especially to write the novel?
Well I stayed in
Delhi to write the book and then later went to Russia. When I
began writing it I knew it was a Delhi book so I came here.
Sometimes you can write books sitting away from the setting but
somehow for the Brainfever Bird, I had to live in the
cities. In the case of my earlier novel (Trotternama) I
was in Lucknow as it is set there.
Your description
of the quite, tranquil countryside in Everest Hotel won
many admirers and critics said you had penchant for bringing
alive the sights and sounds of the hills. So why did you choose
to set your next novel in the cities?
One wants change. One
tends to get tired of writing about the same things and place.
You want to alter the pace as well. That was a quite laid back
novel. This is a completely different book. Its full of action
and set in two cities.
You have said
somewhere that your inability to converse with the man on the
street in his language (Sealy can speak only functional Hindi)
prevents you from understanding him. How much trouble did this
pose for you when you wrote the Brainfever
Bird?
I did visit Old
Delhi but the characters in the book are not based on any real
people I met. I haven’t spoken to anyone for the purpose of my
book. It is always better to be able to speak with the people
you are writing about but it is also possible to imagine them
more clearly than if I had spoken with them.
You keep the
present tense in both Everest Hotel and The Brainfever
Bird. Any particular reason for this?
Present tense
brings immediacy. I used this tense in Everest Hotel and
I followed it in The Brainfever Bird. Present tense shows
that the act is not yet complete. Something is yet to be
finished. This sort of impression was important in these two
books.
Your writing is
rich in poetry. Do you set out to write in this manner?
Yes, my books have
poetic prose. This is because I think my observation in closer,
deeper. I feel as one with the scene I am describing. It just
happens. I do not set out to write it that way.
You are known to
be a reticent man shunning public glare. How do you handle the
mandatory grind of book-readings, fancy book-launches,
press-interviews etc.?
Ideally I would
want my books to speak for themselves but sometimes you are
required to talk about the book and answer questions about it .
If that means more people will read the book then there is no
harm.
(Photo by Subhash
Bhardwaj)
|